The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three‐dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit
Open accessAbstract
Direct laser writing has become a versatile and routine tool for the mask‐free fabrication of polymer structures with lateral linewidths down to less than 100 nm. In contrast to its planar counterpart, electron‐beam lithography, direct laser writing also allows for the making of three‐dimensional structures. However, its spatial resolution has been restricted by diffraction. Clearly, linewidths and resolutions on the scale of few tens of nanometers and below are highly desirable for various applications in nanotechnology. In visible‐light far‐field fluorescence microscopy, the concept of stimulated emission depletion (STED) introduced in 1994 has led to spectacular record resolutions down to 5.6 nm in 2009. This review addresses approaches aiming at translating this success in optical microscopy to optical lithography. After explaining basic principles and limitations, possible depletion mechanisms and recent lithography experiments by various groups are summarized. Today, Abbe's diffraction barrier as well as the generalized two‐photon Sparrow criterion have been broken in far‐field optical lithography. For further future progress in resolution, the development of novel tailored photoresists in combination with attractive laser sources is of utmost importance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hell, S. W. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137395 · Cited by 2,967
Finer features for functional microdevices
Kawata, S., Sun, H.-B., Tanaka, T., & Takada, K. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089130 · Cited by 2,871
Recent progress in multiphoton microfabrication
Maruo, S., & Fourkas, J. T. (2008) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.200710039 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Sub-micrometre accurate free-form optics by three-dimensional printing on single-mode fibres
Gissibl, T., Thiele, S., Herkommer, A., & Giessen, H. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11763 · Cited by 359
3D printing of functional microrobots
Li, J., & Pumera, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01062f · Cited by 303
Digital manufacture of shape changing components
Yu, K., Dunn, M. L., & Qi, H. J. (2015) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2015.07.005 · Cited by 76
Ultrafast Laser Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Saunders, J., Elbestawi, M., & Fang, Q. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp7030089 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, J., & Wegener, M.
- Venue
- Laser & Photonics Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-44
- ISSN
- 1863-8880 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-8899
- OpenAlex
- W1543771085
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lpor.201100046
- The paper
- Fischer, J., & Wegener, M. (2013). Three‐dimensional optical laser lithography beyond the diffraction limit. Laser & Photonics Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201100046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.