The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanisms of intraocular photodisruption with picosecond and nanosecond laser pulses
Abstract
Nd:YAG laser photodisruption with nanosecond (ns) pulses is an established method for intraocular surgery. In order to assess whether an increased precision can be achieved by the use of picosecond (ps) pulses, the plasma size, the shock wave characteristics, and the cavitation bubble expansion after optical breakdown with ps‐ and ns‐laser pulses were investigated by time‐resolved photography and acoustic measurements. Nd:YAG laser pulses with a duration of 30 ps and 6 ns, respectively, were focused into a water‐filled glass cuvette. Frequency doubled light from the same laser pulses was optically delayed between 2 ns and 136 ns and used as illumination light source for photography. Since the individual events were well reproducible, the shock wave and bubble wall position could be determined as a function of time. From the slope of these r(t) curves, the shock wave and bubble wall velocities were determined, and the shock wave pressure was calculated from the shock velocity. The plasma size at various laser pulse energies was measured from photographs of the plasma radiation. The breakdown thresholds at 30 ps and 6 ns pulse duration were found to be 15 μJ and 200 μJ, respectively. At threshold, ps‐plasmas are shorter than ns‐plasmas, but at the same pulse energy they are always ∼2.5 times longer. The initial shock pressures were 17 kbar after ps‐pulses with an energy of 50 μJ, and 21 kbar after 1 mJ ns‐pulses. The pressure amplitude decayed much faster after the ps‐pulses. The maximum expansion velocity of the cavitation bubble was 350 m/s after a 50 μJ ps‐pulse, but 1,600 m/s after a 1 mJ ns‐pulse. The side effects of intraocular microsurgery associated with shock wave emission and cavitation bubble expansion can be considerably reduced by the use of ps‐pulses, and new applications of photodisruption may become possible. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Pulsed Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues
Vogel, A., & Venugopalan, V. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010379n · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationNoack, J., & Vogel, A. (1999) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.777215 · Cited by 618
Self-citationKennedy, P. K. (1995) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.477753 · Cited by 349
Laser-induced breakdown in aqueous media
Kennedy, P. K., Hammer, D. X., & Rockwell, B. A. (1997) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6727(97)00002-5 · Cited by 324
Youssef, P. N., Sheibani, N., & Albert, D. M. (2011) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2010.149 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel, A., Busch, S., Jungnickel, K., & Birngruber, R.
- Venue
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-43
- ISSN
- 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2083511702
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of intraocular photodisruption with picosecond and nanosecond laser pulses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.1900150106
- The paper
- Vogel, A., Busch, S., Jungnickel, K., & Birngruber, R. (1994). Mechanisms of intraocular photodisruption with picosecond and nanosecond laser pulses. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900150106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.