Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,605

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fractional Photothermolysis: A New Concept for Cutaneous Remodeling Using Microscopic Patterns of Thermal Injury

Open access
Manstein, Dieter, Herron, G. Scott, Sink, R. Kehl, Tanner, Heather, Anderson, R. Rox·2004·Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We introduce and clinically examine a new concept of skin treatment called fractional photothermolysis (FP), achieved by applying an array of microscopic treatment zones (MTZ) of thermal injury to the skin. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Two prototype devices emitting at 1.5 μm wavelength provided a pattern of micro‐exposures with variable MTZ density. Effects of different MTZ densities were tested on the forearms of 15 subjects. Clinical effects and histology were assessed up to 3 months after exposure. Treatment of photoaged skin on the periorbital area in an additional 30 subjects receiving four treatments over a period of 2–3 weeks was also tested. Tissue shrinkage and clinical effects were assessed up to 3 months after treatment. Results: Pattern densities with spacing of 250 μm or more were well tolerated. Typical MTZ had a diameter of 100 μm and penetrated 300 μm into the skin. Reepithelialization was complete within 1 day. Clinical effects were assessed over a 3‐month period. Histology at 3 months revealed enhanced undulating rete ridges and increased mucin deposition within the superficial dermis. Periorbital treatments were well tolerated with minimal erythema and edema. Linear shrinkage of 2.1% was measured 3 months after the last treatment. The wrinkle score improved 18% (P<0.001) 3 months after the last treatment. Conclusions: FP is a new concept for skin restoration treatment. Safety and efficacy were demonstrated with a prototype device. Further clinical studies are necessary to refine the optimum parameters and to explore further dermatological applications. Lasers Surg. Med. 34:426–438, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lsm.20048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,605

Metadata

Authors
Manstein, D., Herron, G. S., Sink, R. K., Tanner, H., & Anderson, R. R.
Venue
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
426-438
ISSN
  • 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9101
OpenAlex
W2122265366
Cited by
1,605
References
1
FWCI
35.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractional Photothermolysis: A New Concept for Cutaneous Remodeling Using Microscopic Patterns of Thermal Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.20048
The paper
Manstein, D., Herron, G. S., Sink, R. K., Tanner, H., & Anderson, R. R. (2004). Fractional Photothermolysis: A New Concept for Cutaneous Remodeling Using Microscopic Patterns of Thermal Injury. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.