The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vivo histological evaluation of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device
Abstract
Background and Objectives: A novel carbon dioxide (CO 2) laser device employing ablative fractional resurfacing was tested on human skin in vivo for the first time. Study Design/Materials and Methods: An investigational 30 W, 10.6 µm CO 2 laser system was focused to a 1/e2 spot size of 120 µm to generate an array of microscopic treatment zones (MTZ) in human forearm skin. A range of pulse energies between 5 and 40 mJ was tested and lesion dimensions were assessed histologically using hematoxylin & eosin. Wound healing of the MTZ's was assessed immediately‐, 2‐day, 7‐day, 1‐month, and 3‐month post treatment. The role of heat shock proteins was examined by immunohistochemistry. Results: The investigational CO 2 laser system created a microscopic pattern of ablative and thermal injury in human skin. The epidermis and part of the dermis demonstrated columns of thermal coagulation that surrounded tapering ablative zones lined by a thin eschar layer. Changing the pulse energy from 5 to 30 mJ resulted in a greater than threefold increase in lesion depth and twofold increase in width. Expression of heat shock protein (hsp)72 was detected as early as 2 days post‐treatment and diminished significantly by 3 months. In contrast, increased expression of hsp47 was first detected at 7 days and persisted at 3 months post‐treatment. Conclusion: The thermal effects of a novel investigational ablative CO 2 laser system utilizing fractional resurfacing were characterized in human forearm skin. We confirmed our previous ex vivo findings and show for the first time in‐vivo, that a controlled array of microscopic treatment zones of ablation and coagulation could be deposited in human skin by varying treatment pulse energy. Immunohistochemical studies of heat shock proteins revealed a persistent collagen remodeling response lasting at least 3 months. We successfully demonstrated the first in‐vivo use of ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR™) treatment on human skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 39:96–107, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ganceviciene, R., Liakou, A. I., Theodoridis, A., Makrantonaki, E., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2012) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.22804 · Cited by 844
Bipolar fractional radiofrequency treatment induces neoelastogenesis and neocollagenesis
Hantash, B. M., Ubeid, A. A., Chang, H., Kafi, R., & Renton, B. (2009) · Lasers in Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.1002/lsm.20731 · Cited by 307
Self-citationFractional CO2 laser‐assisted drug delivery
Hædersdal, M., Sakamoto, F. H., Farinelli, W. A., Doukas, A. G., Tam, J., & Anderson, R. R. (2010) · Lasers in Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.1002/lsm.20860 · Cited by 273
Review of Fractional Photothermolysis: Treatment Indications and Efficacy
Tierney, E. P., Kouba, D. J., & Hanke, W. C. (2009) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01258.x · Cited by 189
Waibel, J. S., Mi, Q., Ozog, D., Qu, L., Zhou, L., Rudnick, A., Al‐Niaimi, F., Woodward, J., Campos, V., & Mordon, S. (2016) · Lasers in Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.1002/lsm.22448 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Hantash, B. M., Bedi, V. P., Kapadia, B., Rahman, Z., Jiang, K., Tanner, H., Chan, K. F., & Zachary, C. B.
- Venue
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-107
- ISSN
- 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2127252078
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo histological evaluation of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.20468
- The paper
- Hantash, B. M., Bedi, V. P., Kapadia, B., Rahman, Z., Jiang, K., Tanner, H., Chan, K. F., & Zachary, C. B. (2007). In vivo histological evaluation of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.