Cited by 10Optical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging

The effect of melanin on in vivo optical coherence tomography of the skin in a multiethnic cohort

Ekelem, Chloe, Yu, Junxiao, Heydarlou, Dorsa, Heidari, Emon, Csuka, Ella, Chen, Zhongping, Mesinkovska, Natasha Atanaskova·2019·Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive real‐time assessment of living tissue is quickly becoming invaluable for bolstering histologic and dermatoscopic measures of cutaneous conditions. While many skin researchers have explored the utility of noninvasive imaging in inflammatory and malignant skin conditions, there is yet to be a definitive and direct assessment of the effects of melanin on the quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and its accuracy in multiethnic patient populations. We conducted a study to evaluate the effects of melanin on the quality of in vivo OCT imaging. Methods: Volunteers of all Fitzpatrick skin types were imaged once in five skin regions. Images were analyzed for quality, defined quantitatively as depreciation of light as it passes through the depth of skin, and qualitatively as depth and contrast ranked by blinded clinicians. Results: Our analysis of sixteen subjects shows that there is a significant difference in quantitative OCT image quality between light (Fitzpatrick I–III) and dark (IV–VI) skin types for both epidermal (p 0.0328) and dermal levels (p 0.0021). However, there was no significant difference in qualitative blinded rater measures of image clarity (p 0.11) or perceived depth (p 0.13). Conclusion: Based on our definition of image quality, our study shows that OCT images taken from darker skin types have slightly lower quality than those taken from lighter skin. However, because blinded rater assessment showed no differences in clarity or perceived depth, we conclude that OCT may be used without hesitation for manual visualization of skin and its appendages in all Fitzpatrick skin types. Further studies are required to more extensively characterize the effects of melanin on OCT imaging. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:407–411, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lsm.23086

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekelem, C., Yu, J., Heydarlou, D., Heidari, E., Csuka, E., Chen, Z., & Mesinkovska, N. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Mesinkovska, Natasha Atanaskova
Venue
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-18
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
407-411
ISSN
  • 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9101
OpenAlex
W2924481518
Cited by
10
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Keywords
melanin, optical coherence tomography, skin imaging, Fitzpatrick skin type, image quality, epidermis, dermis, multi-ethnic population, non-invasive skin imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review