The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Addition of serum sodium into the MELD score predicts waiting list mortality better than MELD alone
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we investigated the prognostic value of serum sodium and hyponatremia (≤130 mEq/L) in 262 cirrhotic patients consecutively listed, 19 of which died (7%), 175 survived (67%), and 68 underwent liver transplantation (26%) during 3 months of follow-up. Hyponatremia was present in 63% of patients who died, compared to 13% of those who survived ( P < .001), whereas the proportion with elevated creatinine (≥1.4 mg/dL) was low and similar in both groups (10.5 vs. 3%). Prevalence of hyponatremia was higher than that of elevated serum creatinine across all model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) categories. Using logistic regression, hyponatremia and serum sodium were significant predictors of mortality with concordance statistics (c-statistics) .753 for hyponatremia, .784 for sodium, .894 for MELD, .905 for MELD plus hyponatremia ( P = .006 vs. MELD alone), and .908 for MELD plus serum sodium ( P = .026 vs. MELD alone). Risk of death across all MELD scores was higher for patients with hyponatremia than without hyponatremia. Cox regression considering data within 6 months of follow-up yielded qualitatively similar results, with hyponatremia being a significant predictor of greater mortality risk with an odds ratio of 2.65 ( P = .015). Each increase of 1 mEq/L of serum sodium level was associated with a decreased odds ratio of .95 ( P = .048). Our results indicate that hyponatremia appears to be an earlier and more sensitive marker than serum creatinine to detect renal impairment and / or circulatory dysfunction in patients with advanced cirrhosis. In conclusion, addition of serum sodium to MELD identified a subgroup of patients with poor outcome in a more efficient way than MELD alone and significantly increased the efficacy of the score to predict waitlist mortality. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:336–343.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
D'Amico, G., Garcia-Tsao, G., & Pagliaro, L. (2006) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013 · Cited by 2,687
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)
Kamath, P. S., & Kim, R. W. (2007) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.21563 · Cited by 1,674
Müller Glial Cells in Retinal Disease
Bringmann, A., & Wiedemann, P. (2012) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000328979 · Cited by 436
Moderate hyponatremia is associated with increased risk of mortality: evidence from a meta-analysis
Corona, G., Giuliani, C., Parenti, G., Norello, D., Verbalis, J. G., Forti, G., Maggi, M., & Peri, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080451 · Cited by 301
The MELD score in patients awaiting liver transplant: Strengths and weaknesses
Bernardi, M., Gitto, S., & Biselli, M. (2011) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.008 · Cited by 174
Kim, D.-S., Yoon, Y.-I., Kim, B. K., Choudhury, A., Kulkarni, A., Park, J. Y., Kim, J., Sinn, D. H., Joo, D. J., Choi, Y., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruf, A. E., Kremers, W. K., Chavez, L. L., Descalzi, V. I., Podesta, L. G., & Villamil, F. G.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 336-343
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138086580
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.