The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Percutaneous Ablation Procedures in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Submitted to Liver Transplantation: Assessment of Efficacy at Explant Analysis and of Safety for Tumor Recurrence
Open accessAbstract
Aims of this retrospective study were to analyze the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) submitted to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We studied 40 patients undergoing OLT in whom 46 HCC nodules had been treated with PEI (13 nodules), RFA (30 nodules), or PEI+RFA (3 nodules). Child-Turcotte-Pugh class was A in 18 cases, B in 18, and C in 4. The mean waiting time for OLT was 9.5 months. The effectiveness of ablation techniques was evaluated by histological examination of the explanted livers. Complete necrosis was found in 19 nodules (41.3%), partial or absent necrosis in 27 nodules (58.7%). Among the 30 nodules treated by RFA, 14 were completely necrotic (46.7%) and 16 demonstrated partial necrosis (53.3%). Considering the 13 neoplasms undergoing PEI, 3 nodules showed complete necrosis (23.1%), 6 partial necrosis (46.1%), and 4 absent necrosis (30.8%). The rate of complete necrosis was 53.1% for nodules smaller than 3 cm and 14.3% for larger lesions ( P = 0.033) but increased to 61.9% when considering only the lesions smaller than 3 cm treated by RFA. During the follow up, HCC recurred in 3 patients treated by PEI. No cases of HCC recurrence at the abdominal wall level were recorded. Percutaneous ablation procedures are effective treatments in cirrhotic patients with HCC submitted to OLT and are not associated to an increased risk of tumor recurrence. RFA provides complete necrosis in most nodules smaller than 3 cm, and appears to be the best treatment option in these cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
Wahl, D. R., Stenmark, M. H., Tao, Y., Pollom, E. L., Caoili, E. M., Lawrence, T. S., Schipper, M. J., & Feng, M. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.61.4925 · Cited by 567
Pomfret, E. A., Washburn, K., Wald, C., Nalesnik, M. A., Douglas, D., Russo, M., Roberts, J., Reich, D. J., Schwartz, M. E., Mieles, L., et al. (2010) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.21999 · Cited by 393
Brunello, F., Veltri, A., Carucci, P., Pagano, E., Ciccone, G., Moretto, P., Sacchetto, P., Gandini, G., & Rizzetto, M. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365520701885481 · Cited by 302
Pompili, M., Saviano, A., de Matthaeis, N., Cucchetti, A., Ardito, F., Federico, B., Brunello, F., Pinna, A. D., Giorgio, A., Giulini, S. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.009 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pompili, M., Mirante, V. G., Rondinara, G., Fassati, L. R., Piscaglia, F., Agnes, S., Covino, M., Ravaioli, M., Fagiuoli, S., Gasbarrini, G., & Rapaccini, G. L.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1117-1126
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165573336
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.