Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences

Open access
Verdonk, Robert C., Buis, Carlijn I., Porte, Robert J., van der Jagt, Eric J., Limburg, Abraham J., van den Berg, Aad P., Slooff, Maarten J.H., Peeters, Paul M.J.G., de Jong, Koert P., Kleibeuker, Jan H., Haagsma, Elizabeth B.·2006·Liver Transplantation

Abstract

We retrospectively studied the prevalence, presentation, results of treatment, and graft and patient survival of grafts developing an anastomotic biliary stricture (AS) in 531 adult liver transplantations performed between 1979 and 2003. Clinical and laboratory information was obtained from the hospital files, and radiological studies were re-evaluated. Twenty-one possible risk factors for the development of AS (variables of donor, recipient, surgical procedure, and postoperative course) were analyzed in a univariate and stepwise multivariate model. Forty-seven grafts showed an anastomotic stricture: 42 in duct-to-duct anastomoses, and 5 in hepaticojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomoses. The cumulative risk of AS after 1, 5, and 10 years was 6.6%, 10.6%, and 12.3% respectively. Postoperative bile leakage (P = 0.001), a female donor/male recipient combination (P = 0.010), and the era of transplantation (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for the development of an AS. In 47% of cases, additional (radiologically minor) nonanastomotic strictures were diagnosed. All patients were successfully treated by 1 or more treatment modalities. As primary treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was successful in 24 of 36 (67%) cases and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in 4 of 11 (36%). In the end 15 patients (32%) were operated, all with long-term success. AS presenting more than 6 months after transplantation needed more episodes of stenting by ERCP, and more stents per episode compared to those presenting within 6 months and recurred more often. Graft and patient survival were not impaired by AS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lt.20714

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Verdonk, R. C., Buis, C. I., Porte, R. J., van der Jagt, E. J., Limburg, A. J., van den Berg, A. P., Slooff, M. J. H., Peeters, P. M. J. G., de Jong, K. P., Kleibeuker, J. H., & Haagsma, E. B.
Venue
Liver Transplantation
Published
2006
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
726-735
ISSN
  • 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6473
OpenAlex
W2055947078
Cited by
313
References
8
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lt.20714
The paper
Verdonk, R. C., Buis, C. I., Porte, R. J., van der Jagt, E. J., Limburg, A. J., van den Berg, A. P., Slooff, M. J. H., Peeters, P. M. J. G., de Jong, K. P., Kleibeuker, J. H., & Haagsma, E. B. (2006). Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Causes and consequences. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.