The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C and what influences this
Open accessAbstract
1. Liver failure and liver cancer from chronic hepatitis C are the most common indications for liver transplantation and numbers of both are projected to double over the next 20 years. 2. Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft is universal and immediate following liver transplantation and associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis, graft loss and death. 3. Graft and patient survival is reduced in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection compared to HCV-negative recipients. 4. The natural history of chronic hepatitis C is accelerated following liver transplantation compared C, with 20% progressing to cirrhosis by 5 years. However, the rate of fibrosis progression is not uniform and may increase over time. 5. The rates of progression from cirrhosis to decompensation and from decompensation to death are also accelerated following liver transplantation. 6. Multiple host, donor and viral factors are associated with rapid fibrosis progression and HCV-related graft failure. 7. Over the last decade, graft and patient survival rates have improved following liver transplantation for non-HCV disease but not for HCV-cirrhosis. This may reflect worsening donor quality and changes in immunosuppression strategies over recent years. 8. Viral eradication by antiviral therapy prevents disease progression and improves survival. 9. The severity of recurrent hepatitis C at one year post-transplant predicts subsequent progression to cirrhosis. Annual protocol biopsies are recommended to help determine need for antiviral therapy. 10. The projected impact of recurrent hepatitis C on graft and patient survival can only be avoided by the development of safe and effective antiviral strategies which can both prevent initial graft infection and eradicate established hepatitis C recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C
Poynard, T., Bedossa, P., & Opolon, P. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07642-8 · Cited by 3,011
Kato, T., Gaynor, J. J., Yoshida, H., Montalvano, M., Takahashi, H., Pyrsopoulos, N., Nishida, S., Moon, J., Selvaggi, G., Levi, D., et al. (2007) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000282914.20578.7b · Cited by 77
Cited by
Curry, M. P., Forns, X., Chung, R. T., Terrault, N. A., Brown, R., Fenkel, J. M., Gordon, F., O’Leary, J., Kuo, A., Schiano, T., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.023 · Cited by 334
Self-citationPost-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus: Causes, Treatment, and Impact on Outcomes
Shivaswamy, V., Boerner, B., & Larsen, J. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1084 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Gane, E. J.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2008-09-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S36-S44
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6473
- OpenAlex
- W1971795388
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.