The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alpha-fetoprotein and modified response evaluation criteria in Solid Tumors progression after locoregional therapy as predictors of hepatocellular cancer recurrence and death after transplantation
Open accessAbstract
Locoregional therapy (LRT) is being increasingly used for the management of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in patients listed for liver transplantation (LT). Although several selection criteria have been developed, stratifications of survival according to the pathology of explanted livers and pre-LT LRT are lacking. Radiological progression according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) behavior was reviewed for 306 patients within the Milan criteria (MC-IN) and 116 patients outside the Milan criteria (MC-OUT) who underwent LRT and LT between January 1999 and March 2010. A prospectively collected database originating from 6 collaborating European centers was used for the study. Sixty-one patients (14.5%) developed HCC recurrence. For both MC-IN and MC-OUT patients, an AFP slope > 15 ng/mL/month and mRECIST progression were unique independent risk factors for HCC recurrence and patient death. When the radiological Milan criteria (MC) status was combined with radiological and biological progression, MC-IN and MC-OUT patients without risk factors had similarly excellent 5-year tumor-free and patient survival rates. MC-IN patients with at least 1 risk factor had worse outcomes, and MC-OUT patients with at least 1 risk factor had the poorest survival (P < 0.001). In conclusion, both radiological and biological modifications permit documentation of the response to LRT in patients waiting for LT. According to these 2 parameters, tumor progression significantly increases the risk of recurrence and patient death not only for MC-OUT patients but also for MC-IN patients. The monitoring of both parameters in combination with the initial radiological MC status is an essential element for further refining the selection criteria for potential liver recipients with HCC. Liver Transpl 19:1108-1118, 2013. © 2013 AASLD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
European Association for the Study of the Liver, & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 · Cited by 5,218
Cited by
Yao, F. Y., Mehta, N., Flemming, J., Dodge, J., Hameed, B., Fix, O., Hirose, R., Fidelman, N., Kerlan, R. K., & Roberts, J. P. (2015) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.27752 · Cited by 485
Mehta, N., Heimbach, J., Harnois, D. M., Sapisochin, G., Dodge, J. L., Lee, D., Burns, J. M., Sanchez, W., Greig, P. D., Grant, D. R., et al. (2017) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5116 · Cited by 398
Hameed, B., Mehta, N., Sapisochin, G., Roberts, J. P., & Yao, F. Y. (2014) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.23904 · Cited by 279
Mehta, N., Frenette, C., Tabrizian, P., Hoteit, M., Guy, J., Parikh, N., Ghaziani, T. T., Dhanasekaran, R., Dodge, J. L., Natarajan, B., et al. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.033 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, Q., Avolio, A. W., Graziadei, I., Otto, G., Rossi, M., Tisone, G., Goffette, P., Vogel, W., Pitton, M. B., & Lerut, J.
- Venue
- Liver Transplantation
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1108-1118
- ISSN
- 1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124148864
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.