Cited by 138Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Advancement of Biomaterial-Based Postoperative Adhesion Barriers

Chandel, Arvind K. Singh, Shimizu, Atsushi, Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, Ito, Taichi·2021·Macromolecular Bioscience

Abstract

Postoperative peritoneal adhesion (PPA) is a prevalent incidence that generally happens during the healing process of traumatized tissues. It causes multiple severe complications such as intestinal obstruction, chronic abdominal pain, and female infertility. To prevent PPA, several antiadhesion materials and drug delivery systems composed of biomaterials are used clinically, and clinical antiadhesive is one of the important applications nowadays. In addition to several commercially available materials, like film, spray, injectable hydrogel, powder, or solution type have been energetically studied based on natural and synthetic biomaterials such as alginate, hyaluronan, cellulose, starch, chondroitin sulfate, polyethylene glycol, polylactic acid, etc. Moreover, many kinds of animal adhesion models, such as cecum abrasion models and unitary horn models, are developed to evaluate new materials’ efficacy. A new animal adhesion model based on hepatectomy and conventional animal adhesion models is recently developed and a new adhesion barrier by this new model is also developed. In summary, many kinds of materials and animal models are studied; thus, it is quite important to overview this field's current progress. Here, PPA is reviewed in terms of the species of biomaterials and animal models and several problems to be solved to develop better antiadhesion materials in the future are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mabi.202000395

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEG-based barriers effectively prevent fibrotic adhesion formation by creating a hydrated, non-fouling surface that inhibits cellular attachment and extracellular matrix deposition after surgery.

    “PEG-based barriers effectively prevent fibrotic adhesion formation by creating a hydrated, non-fouling surface that inhibits cellular attachment and extracellular matrix deposition following surgical procedures [209,210].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandel, A. K. S., Shimizu, A., Hasegawa, K., & Ito, T.
Affiliations
  • Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Ito, Taichi
Venue
Macromolecular Bioscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-19
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
e2000395-e2000395
ISSN
  • 1616-5187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-5195
OpenAlex
W3122308010
Cited by
138
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Macromolecular Bioscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP26420792)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
postoperative peritoneal adhesions, anti-adhesion barrier, biomaterials, drug delivery systems, alginate, hyaluronic acid, hydrogels, intestinal obstruction, female infertility
MeSH terms
Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Polymers, Postoperative Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review