Cited by 19Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesSupramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials

Ion‐Mediated Gelation of Thermo‐Responsive Cellulose Nanofibril/Poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) Hybrid Hydrogels with Tunable De‐Swelling Kinetics

Open access
Motloung, Bennie, Pfukwa, Rueben, Klumperman, Bert·2024·Macromolecular Materials and Engineering

Abstract

Abstract The tunability of the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) to lower or higher temperatures, as well as the ease of modulation of the LCST phase transition kinetics broadens the scope of application of PNIPAM‐based materials in biomedical fields. This work reports a facile approach to formulate a smart, injectable cellulose nanofibril (CNF)/PNIPAM hybrid gel. Hofmeister salts are used to induce ion‐mediated gelation of the nanofibrils and PNIPAM chains, resulting in an interpenetrating network (IPN) structure. From rheological measurements, the hybrid material displays excellent structural integrity at room temperature and tunable thermo‐stiffening around body temperature. De‐swelling kinetics can be modulated by varying the nature and concentration of the Hofmeister ion used. The successful realization of the IPN hybrid gel structure is dependent on the molecular weight of PNIPAM used. Moreover, the hybrid gels show good thermo‐reversibility during thermal cycling, as well as excellent injectability and remarkable self‐healing post‐injection, owing to shear‐thinning and thixotropic characters. Since rheology is a crucial technique in the analysis of soft matter and flow behavior is fundamental for the design and synthesis of application‐specific viscoelastic materials, the work reported herein provides a rheological basis for careful design and synthesis of smart gels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mame.202300457

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNFs are extracted through mechanical fibrillation methods including high-pressure homogenization and grinding, often aided by chemical or enzymatic pre-treatments such as TEMPO-mediated oxidation to enhance fibrillation efficiency and reduce energy demand.

    “CNFs (Figure 3b), on the other hand, are extracted through mechanical fibrillation methods including high-pressure homogenization and grinding, often aided by chemical or enzymatic pre-treatments such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation to enhance fibrillation efficiency and reduce energy demand [58,59,60]”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results and Discussion and Experimental Section (pages not provided) describe TEMPO oxidation followed by low-energy sonication to isolate CNFs. They do not describe high-pressure homogenization, grinding, or enzymatic pretreatment, or establish that the pretreatment improves fibrillation efficiency or reduces energy demand relative to other methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • FTIR shows characteristic cellulose bands at ~3340 cm−1 (O-H stretching), ~2900 cm−1 (C-H stretching), and ~1050 cm−1 (C-O-C stretching), with additional peaks in modified NC indicating successful surface functionalization.

    “The literature reports characteristic cellulose bands at ~3340 cm−1 (O–H stretching), ~2900 cm−1 (C–H stretching), and ~1050 cm−1 (C–O–C stretching), with additional peaks in modified NC, indicating successful surface functionalization [23,60]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. A. Riedinger, M. Pernia Leal, S. R. Deka, C. George, I. R. Franchini, A. Falqui, R. Cingolani, T. Pellegrino, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3136.
  2. R. Zhang, M. Tang, A. Bowyer, R. Eisenthal, J. Hubble, Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4677.
  3. J. Kolosnjaj-Tabi, L. Gibot, I. Fourquaux, M. Golzio, M.-P. Rols, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 138, 56.
  4. Z. Li, Y. Li, C. Chen, Y. Cheng, J. Controlled Release 2021, 335, 541.
  5. S. Dutta, P. Samanta, D. Dhara, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 87, 92.
  6. A. Raza, U. Hayat, T. Rasheed, M. Bilal, H. M. Iqbal, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 1497.
  7. J. Li, D. J. Mooney, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 1.
  8. L. Wang, M. Zhou, T. Xu, X. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 134625.
  9. S. Mantha, S. Pillai, P. Khayambashi, A. Upadhyay, Y. Zhang, O. Tao, H. M. Pham, S. D. Tran, Materials 2019, 12, 3323.
  10. J. Maitra, V. K. Shukla, Am. J. Polym. Sci. 2014, 4, 25.
  11. Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, Front. Chem. 2021, 8, 615665.
  12. M. Heskins, J. E. Guillet, J. Macromol. Sci. A 1968, 2, 1441.
  13. A. Halperin, M. Kröger, F. M. Winnik, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 15342.
  14. A. S. Hoffman, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 10.
  15. A. Alexander, J. Khan, S. Saraf, S. Saraf, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 88, 575.
  16. Y. Kumashiro, T. Ooya, N. Yui, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 867.
  17. J. P. Chen, T. H. Cheng, Macromol. Biosci. 2006, 6, 1026.
  18. S.-W. Wu, X. Liu, I. I. Miller, A. L. Cheng, Y.-S. Cheng, M.-L. Yeh, L. Lu, Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 308.
  19. Y. Shi, C. Ma, L. Peng, G. Yu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 1219.
  20. C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, A. Concheiro, A. S. Dubovik, N. V. Grinberg, T. V. Burova, V. Y. Grinberg, J. Controlled Release 2005, 102, 629.
  21. M. Wang, J. Qiang, Y. Fang, D. Hu, Y. Cui, X. Fu, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 474.
  22. C.-L. Zhang, F.-H. Cao, J.-L. Wang, Z.-L. Yu, J. Ge, Y. Lu, Z.-H. Wang, S.-H. Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 24857.
  23. X. Zhang, C. L. Pint, M. H. Lee, B. E. Schubert, A. Jamshidi, K. Takei, H. Ko, A. Gillies, R. Bardhan, J. J. Urban, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 3239.
  24. Y. Xia, H. Wu, D. Tang, S. Gao, B. Chen, Z. Zeng, S. Wang, M. Cao, D. Li, Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 679.
  25. C. Teng, D. Xie, J. Wang, Y. Zhu, L. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016, 4, 12884.
  26. S. B. Campbell, M. Patenaude, T. Hoare, Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 644.
  27. R. J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, J. Youngblood, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941.
  28. N. Lin, A. Dufresne, Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302.
  29. K. J. De France, T. Hoare, E. D. Cranston, Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 4609.
  30. K. Jain, R. Vedarajan, M. Watanabe, M. Ishikiriyama, N. Matsumi, Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6819.
  31. J. Wei, Y. Chen, H. Liu, C. Du, H. Yu, Z. Zhou, Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 201.
  32. Y. Li, J. Qin, H. Bao, Y. Han, X. Zeng, H. Zheng, Y. Huang, X. Xia, Z. Dong, R. Hu, Y. Liu, J. Polym. Res. 2018, 25, 1.
  33. X. Sun, P. Tyagi, S. Agate, M. G. McCord, L. A. Lucia, L. Pal, Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 234, 115898.
  34. C. Chang, K. Han, L. Zhang, Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 1329.
  35. J. Yang, F. Xu, C.-R. Han, Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 1019.
  36. A. Hebeish, S. Farag, S. Sharaf, T. I. Shaheen, Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 159.
  37. K. Zubik, P. Singhsa, Y. Wang, H. Manuspiya, R. Narain, Polymers 2017, 9, 119.
  38. X. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Zhao, M. Xiao, W. Zhang, C. Lu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 4321.
  39. A. A. Belyaeva, I. V. Tretyakov, A. V. Kireynov, Y. A. Nashchekina, V. I. Solodilov, E. G. Korzhikova-Vlakh, S. M. Morozova, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 635, 348.
  40. L. Klouda, A. G. Mikos, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 68, 34.
  41. X. Xu, Y. Liu, W. Fu, M. Yao, Z. Ding, J. Xuan, D. Li, S. Wang, Y. Xia, M. Cao, Polymers 2020, 12, 580.
  42. S. Bhattacharjee, Ther. Deliv. 2021, 12, 21.
  43. T. Chen, Y. Yang, H. Peng, A. K. Whittaker, Y. Li, Q. Zhao, Y. Wang, S. Zhu, Z. Wang, Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 266, 118122.
  44. F. Zhou, S. Wu, C. Rader, J. Ma, S. Chen, X. Yuan, E. J. Foster, Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 45.
  45. X. Ma, R. Li, J. Ren, X. Lv, X. Zhao, Q. Ji, Y. Xia, RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 47767.
  46. M. Guvendiren, H. D. Lu, J. A. Burdick, Soft Matter 2012, 8, 260.
  47. A. Rani, S. Monga, M. Bansal, A. Sharma, Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, E55.
  48. X. Sun, F. Xu, R. Sun, Z. Geng, P. Fowler, M. Baird, Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 60, 15.
  49. M. R. K. Sofla, R. J. Brown, T. Tsuzuki, T. J. Rainey, Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 035004.
  50. A. Kumar, Y. S. Negi, N. K. Bhardwaj, V. Choudhary, Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 1364.
  51. A. Kumar, Y. S. Negi, V. Choudhary, N. K. Bhardwaj, J. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2014, 2, 1.
  52. S. Coseri, G. Biliuta, L. F. Zemljič, J. S. Srndovic, P. T. Larsson, S. Strnad, T. Kreže, A. Naderi, T. Lindström, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 85889.
  53. N. Amiralian, P. K. Annamalai, P. Memmott, E. Taran, S. Schmidt, D. J. Martin, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 32124.
  54. R. K. Johnson, A. Zink-Sharp, S. H. Renneckar, W. G. Glasser, Cellulose 2009, 16, 227.
  55. M. Pääkkö, M. Ankerfors, H. Kosonen, A. Nykänen, S. Ahola, M. Österberg, J. Ruokolainen, J. Laine, P. T. Larsson, O. Ikkala, Biomacro- molecules 2007, 8, 1934.
  56. R. J. Crawford, K. J. Edler, S. Lindhoud, J. L. Scott, G. Unali, Green Chem. 2012, 14, 300.
  57. V. S. Raghuwanshi, D. J. Mendoza, C. Browne, M. Ayurini, G. Gervinskas, J. F. Hooper, J. Mata, C.-M. Wu, G. P. Simon, G. Garnier, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 652, 1609.
  58. L. Tavagnacco, E. Zaccarelli, E. Chiessi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 9997.
  59. R. Pelton, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 348, 673.
  60. K. M. Z. Hossain, V. Calabrese, M. A. Da Silva, S. J. Bryant, J. Schmitt, J. H. Ahn-Jarvis, F. J. Warren, Y. Z. Khimyak, J. L. Scott, K. J. Edler, Polymers 2021, 13, 951.
  61. H. Dong, J. F. Snyder, K. S. Williams, J. W. Andzelm, Biomacro- molecules 2013, 14, 3338.
  62. H. Tsukeshiba, M. Huang, Y.-H. Na, T. Kurokawa, R. Kuwabara, Y. Tanaka, H. Furukawa, Y. Osada, J. P. Gong, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 16304.
  63. Y.-H. Na, T. Kurokawa, Y. Katsuyama, H. Tsukeshiba, J. P. Gong, Y. Osada, S. Okabe, T. Karino, M. Shibayama, Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5370.
  64. Z. Tong, F. Zeng, X. Zheng, T. Sato, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4488.
  65. Y. Ding, X. Ye, G. Zhang, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 904.
  66. Q. Gui, B. Fu, Y. He, S. Lyu, Y. Ma, Y. Wang, iScience 2021, 24, 102085.
  67. N. Tang, Z. Peng, R. Guo, M. An, X. Chen, X. Li, N. Yang, J. Zang, Polymers 2017, 9, 688.
  68. C. D. Díaz-Marín, L. Zhang, B. El Fil, Z. Lu, M. Alshrah, J. C. Grossman, E. N. Wang, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 195, 123103.
  69. J. Li, X. Gong, X. Yi, P. Sheng, W. Wen, Smart Mater. Struct. 2011, 20, 075005.
  70. R. Dimatteo, N. J. Darling, T. Segura, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 127, 167.
  71. C. Loebel, C. B. Rodell, M. H. Chen, J. A. Burdick, Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1521.
  72. F. Cuomo, M. Cofelice, F. Lopez, Polymers 2019, 11, 259.
  73. M. Stieger, Appl. Rheol. 2002, 12, 232.
  74. C. Yan, A. Altunbas, T. Yucel, R. P. Nagarkar, J. P. Schneider, D. J. Pochan, Soft Matter 2010, 6, 5143.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motloung, B., Pfukwa, R., & Klumperman, B.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Pfukwa, Rueben
  • Klumperman, Bert
Venue
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-16
Volume
309
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1438-7492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-2054
OpenAlex
W4396954843
Cited by
19
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecular Materials and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation (102586)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Keywords
cellulose nanofibers, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), hybrid hydrogels, lower critical solution temperature, thermosensitive hydrogel, interpenetrating polymer networks, injectable hydrogel, self-healing, shear thinning, thixotropy, molecular weight effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review