The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers
Abstract
Given that overconsumption in industrial countries is a main cause of environmental degradation, a shift toward more sustainable consumption patterns is required. This study attempts to uncover personal and contextual barriers to consumers' purchases of green food and to strengthen knowledge about fostering green purchases. Survey data are used to examine the influence of distinct categories of personal factors (such as attitudes, personal norms, perceived behavior barriers, knowledge) and contextual factors (such as socioeconomic characteristics, living conditions, and store characteristics) on green purchases of Swiss consumers. Results from regression analysis suggest that green food purchases are facilitated by positive attitudes of consumers toward (a) environmental protection, (b) fair trade, (c) local products, and (d) availability of action‐related knowledge. In turn, green behavior is negatively associated with (e) perceived time barriers and (f) frequency of shopping in supermarkets. Surprisingly, green purchases are not significantly related to moral thinking, monetary barriers, or the socioeconomic characteristics of the consumers. Implications for policy makers and for companies and marketers engaged in the promotion and commercialization of green products are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences
Stevens, J. P., & Stevens, J. P. (2001) · doi:10.4324/9781410604491 · Cited by 4,993
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising
Roberts, J. A. (1996) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6 · Cited by 1,603
Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916595275005 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001 · Cited by 1,048
Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention
Sreen, N., Purbey, S., & Sadarangani, P. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.002 · Cited by 741
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 883-902
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2072625235
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.