Cited by 9Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and ApplicationsCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Highly Efficient Recycling Waste Plastic into Hydrogen and Carbon Nanotubes through a Double Layer Microwave‐Assisted Pyrolysis Method

Wang, Song, Hu, Yanbing, Lu, Shuai, Zhang, Bin, Li, Sanxi, Chen, Xuecheng·2024·Macromolecular Rapid Communications

Abstract

Microwave‐assisted pyrolysis of PE to hydrogen and carbon material has great potential to solve the problem of waste PE induced white pollution and provide a promising way to produce hydrogen energy. To increase the hydrogen yield, a new microwave‐assisted pyrolysis procedure should be developed. In the present study, a facile double‐layer microwave‐assisted pyrolysis (DLMP) method is developed to pyrolyze PE. Within this method, PE can be converted to hydrogen, multiwalled carbon nanotubes with extremely high efficiency compared with the traditional methods. A high hydrogen yield of 66.4 mmol g−1PE is achieved, which is ≈93% of the upper limit of the theoretical hydrogen yield generated from the PE pyrolysis process. The mechanism of high hydrogen yield during the microwave‐assisted pyrolysis of PE using the DLMP method is also clarified in detail. The DLMP method paved the potential way for recycling plastic waste into high‐value‐added products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/marc.202400270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FeAlOx catalytic system performed best in DLMP, with a yield of 66.4 mmol/g PE, equivalent to 93% of PE's theoretical maximum hydrogen potential.

    “The FeAlO x catalytic system performed best, with a yield of 66.4 mmol/g PE, equivalent to 93% of PE's theoretical maximum hydrogen potential.”
  • Double-Layer Microwave-assisted Pyrolysis (DLMP) significantly enhanced hydrogen generation efficiency by covering the primary catalyst-PE mixture layer with a secondary catalyst layer.

    “This method significantly enhanced hydrogen generation efficiency by covering the primary catalyst-PE mixture layer with a secondary catalyst layer.”
  • Using DLMP, various catalyst systems achieved hydrogen yields exceeding 60 mmol/g PE.

    “Experimental results showed that using DLMP, various catalyst systems achieved hydrogen yields exceeding 60 mmol/g PE.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 9

Authors
Wang, S., Hu, Y., Lu, S., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • Shenyang University of Technology (CN)
  • West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Sanxi
  • Chen, Xuecheng
Venue
Macromolecular Rapid Communications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-07-29
Volume
45
Issue
18
Pages
e2400270-e2400270
ISSN
  • 1022-1336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3927
OpenAlex
W4401099719
Cited by
9
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Macromolecular Rapid Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
polyethylene, microwave pyrolysis, hydrogen production, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, plastic recycling, white pollution, pyrolysis mechanism, hydrogen yield
MeSH terms
Pyrolysis, Hydrogen, Microwaves, Plastics, Nanotubes, Carbon, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review