The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative high‐throughput analysis of drugs in biological matrices by mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
I. Introduction 195 II. Automated Sample Preparation 197 A. Sample Collection 197 B. Sample Pooling 197 C. Off‐Line Sample Preparation 199 D. On‐Line Sample Preparation 200 1. Drirect Plasma Injection 201 a. Turbulent flow and large‐particle high‐flow separation 202 b. Restricted‐access media columns 203 2. Sample Pre‐Treatment 203 III. Sample Analysis 203 A. Separation Techniques 203 B. Serial Approaches 204 1. Fast Chromatography 204 2. Monolithic HPLC Columns 204 3. Packed Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatography 205 C. Parallel Approaches 205 IV. Detection 207 A. Mass Analyzer 207 B. Matrix Suppression 208 C. Metabolite Interferences 209 V. Future Perspectives and Conclusions 209 Acknowledgments 210 References 210 To support pharmacokinetic and drug metabolism studies, LC–MS/MS plays more and more an essential role for the quantitation of drugs and their metabolites in biological matrices. With the new challenges encountered in drug discovery and drug development, new strategies are put in place to achieve high‐throughput analysis, using serial and parallel approaches. To speed‐up method development and validation, generic approaches with the direct injection of biological fluids is highly desirable. Column‐switching, using various packing materials for the extraction columns, is widely applied. Improvement of mass spectrometers performance, and in particular triple quadrupoles, also strongly influences sample preparation strategies, which remain a key element in the bioanalytical process. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 22:195–214, 2003; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mas.10050
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taylor, P. J. (2005) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.11.007 · Cited by 1,248
A biosynthetic pathway for anandamide
Liu, J., Wang, L., Harvey-White, J., Osei-Hyiaman, D., Razdan, R., Gong, Q., Chan, A. C., Zhou, Z., Huang, B. X., Kim, H.-Y., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601832103 · Cited by 470
Hopfgartner, G., Varesio, E., Tschäppät, V., Grivet, C., Bourgogne, E., & Leuthold, L. A. (2004) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.659 · Cited by 287
Self-citationBadoud, F., Grata, E., Boccard, J., Guillarme, D., Veuthey, J.-L., Rudaz, S., & Saugy, M. (2011) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-011-4779-8 · Cited by 97
Guo, B., Chen, B., Liu, A., Zhu, W., & Yao, S. (2012) · Current Drug Metabolism · doi:10.2174/138920012803341401 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopfgartner, G., & Bourgogne, E.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-214
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W1979575164
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative high‐throughput analysis of drugs in biological matrices by mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.10050
- The paper
- Hopfgartner, G., & Bourgogne, E. (2003). Quantitative high‐throughput analysis of drugs in biological matrices by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.