The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical cross‐linking and mass spectrometry to map three‐dimensional protein structures and protein–protein interactions
Abstract
Closely related to studying the function of a protein is the analysis of its three‐dimensional structure and the identification of interaction sites with its binding partners. An alternative approach to the high‐resolution methods for three‐dimensional protein structure analysis, such as X‐ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy, consists of covalently connecting two functional groups of the protein(s) under investigation. The location of the created cross‐links imposes a distance constraint on the location of the respective side chains and allows one to draw conclusions on the three‐dimensional structure of the protein or a protein complex. Recently, chemical cross‐linking of proteins has been combined with a mass spectrometric analysis of the created cross‐linked products. This review article describes the most popular cross‐linking reagents for protein structure analysis and gives an overview of the different available strategies that employ chemical cross‐linking and different mass spectrometric techniques. The challenges for mass spectrometry caused by the enormous complexity of the cross‐linking reaction mixtures are emphasized. The various approaches described in the literature to facilitate the mass spectrometric detection of cross‐linked products as well as computer software for data analyses are reviewed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 25:663–682, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Junge, H. J., Rhee, J.-S., Jahn, O., Varoqueaux, F., Spiess, J., Waxham, M. N., Rosenmund, C., & Brose, N. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.029 · Cited by 290
Lanman, J., Lam, T. T., Barnes, S., Sakalian, M., Emmett, M. R., Marshall, A. G., & Prevelige, P. E. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01245-7 · Cited by 206
Cited by
Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology
Heck, A. J. R. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1265 · Cited by 766
Chemical cross‐linking with NHS esters: a systematic study on amino acid reactivities
Mädler, S., Bich, C., Touboul, D., & Zenobi, R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1544 · Cited by 305
False discovery rate estimation for cross-linked peptides identified by mass spectrometry
Walzthoeni, T., Claassen, M., Leitner, A., Herzog, F., Bohn, S., Förster, F., Beck, M., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2103 · Cited by 301
Sutherland, B. W., Toews, J., & Kast, J. (2008) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1415 · Cited by 273
Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies
Alber, F., Förster, F., Korkin, D., Topf, M., & Sali, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060407.135530 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinz, A.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 663-682
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2018272940
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical cross‐linking and mass spectrometry to map three‐dimensional protein structures and protein–protein interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20082
- The paper
- Sinz, A. (2006). Chemical cross‐linking and mass spectrometry to map three‐dimensional protein structures and protein–protein interactions. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.