The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry: A review
Open accessAbstract
Although comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) has been on the scene for more than 15 years, it is still generally considered a relatively novel technique and is yet far from being fully established. The revolutionary aspect of GC × GC, with respect to classical multidimensional chromatography, is that the entire sample is subjected to two distinct analytical separations. The resulting enhanced separating capacity makes this approach a prime choice when GC analysts are challenged with highly complex mixtures. The combination of a third mass spectrometric dimension to a GC × GC system generates the most powerful analytical tool today for volatile and semi‐volatile analytes. The present review is focused on the rather brief, but not scant, history of comprehensive two‐dimensional GC‐MS: the first experiments were carried out at the end of the 1990s and, since then, the methodology has been increasingly studied and applied. Almost all GC × GC‐MS applications have been carried out by using either a time‐of‐flight or quadrupole mass analyzer; significant experiments relative to a variety of research fields, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the MS systems employed, are discussed. The principles, practical and theoretical aspects, and the most significant developments of GC × GC are also described. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 27:101–124, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ma, C., Wang, H., Lu, X., Li, H., Liu, B., & Xu, G. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.080 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Natural product isolation – how to get from biological material to pure compounds
Bucar, F., Wube, A., & Schmid, M. (2013) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c3np20106f · Cited by 373
Pasikanti, K. K., Esuvaranathan, K., Hong, Y., Ho, P. C., Mahendran, R., Raman Nee Mani, L., Chiong, E., & Chan, E. C. Y. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr4000448 · Cited by 113
A New Dimension in Separation Science: Comprehensive Two‐Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Meinert, C., & Meierhenrich, U. J. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201200842 · Cited by 106
Rathsack, P., Wollmerstaedt, H., Kuchling, T., & Kureti, S. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.076 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondello, L., Tranchida, P. Q., Dugo, P., & Dugo, G.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-31
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-124
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2094160988
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20158
- The paper
- Mondello, L., Tranchida, P. Q., Dugo, P., & Dugo, G. (2008). Comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry: A review. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.