The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is increasingly applied to synthetic polymers to characterize chain‐end or in‐chain substituents, distinguish isobaric and isomeric species, and determine macromolecular connectivities and architectures. For confident structural assignments, the fragmentation mechanisms of polymer ions must be understood, as they provide guidelines on how to deduce the desired information from the fragments observed in MS/MS spectra. This article reviews the fragmentation pathways of synthetic polymer ions that have been energized to decompose via collisionally activated dissociation (CAD), the most widely used activation method in polymer analysis. The compounds discussed encompass polystyrenes, poly(2‐vinyl pyridine), polyacrylates, poly(vinyl acetate), aliphatic polyester copolymers, polyethers, and poly(dimethylsiloxane). For a number of these polymers, several substitution patterns and architectures are considered, and questions regarding the ionization agent and internal energy of the dissociating precursor ions are also addressed. Competing and consecutive dissociations are evaluated in terms of the structural insight they provide about the macromolecular structure. The fragmentation pathways of the diverse array of polymer ions examined fall into three categories, viz. (1) charge‐directed fragmentations, (2) charge‐remote rearrangements, and (3) charge‐remote fragmentations via radical intermediates. Charge‐remote processes predominate. Depending on the ionizing agent and the functional groups in the polymer, the incipient fragments arising by pathways (1)–(3) may form ion–molecule complexes that survive long enough to permit inter‐fragment hydrogen atom, proton, or hydride transfers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 30:523–559, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Cited by
Molecular Characterization of Polymer Networks
Danielsen, S. P. O., Beech, H. K., Wang, S., El-Zaatari, B. M., Wang, X., Sapir, L., Ouchi, T., Wang, Z., Johnson, P. N., Hu, Y., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01304 · Cited by 336
Design and synthesis of digitally encoded polymers that can be decoded and erased
Roy, R. K., Meszynska, A., Laure, C., Charles, L., Verchin, C., & Lutz, J.-F. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8237 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesdemiotis, C., Solak, N., Polce, M. J., Dabney, D. E., Chaicharoen, K., & Katzenmeyer, B. C.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-559
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W1985474359
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20282
- The paper
- Wesdemiotis, C., Solak, N., Polce, M. J., Dabney, D. E., Chaicharoen, K., & Katzenmeyer, B. C. (2011). Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.