Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions

Wesdemiotis, Chrys, Solak, Nilüfer, Polce, Michael J., Dabney, David E., Chaicharoen, Kittisak, Katzenmeyer, Bryan C.·2011·Mass Spectrometry Reviews

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is increasingly applied to synthetic polymers to characterize chain‐end or in‐chain substituents, distinguish isobaric and isomeric species, and determine macromolecular connectivities and architectures. For confident structural assignments, the fragmentation mechanisms of polymer ions must be understood, as they provide guidelines on how to deduce the desired information from the fragments observed in MS/MS spectra. This article reviews the fragmentation pathways of synthetic polymer ions that have been energized to decompose via collisionally activated dissociation (CAD), the most widely used activation method in polymer analysis. The compounds discussed encompass polystyrenes, poly(2‐vinyl pyridine), polyacrylates, poly(vinyl acetate), aliphatic polyester copolymers, polyethers, and poly(dimethylsiloxane). For a number of these polymers, several substitution patterns and architectures are considered, and questions regarding the ionization agent and internal energy of the dissociating precursor ions are also addressed. Competing and consecutive dissociations are evaluated in terms of the structural insight they provide about the macromolecular structure. The fragmentation pathways of the diverse array of polymer ions examined fall into three categories, viz. (1) charge‐directed fragmentations, (2) charge‐remote rearrangements, and (3) charge‐remote fragmentations via radical intermediates. Charge‐remote processes predominate. Depending on the ionizing agent and the functional groups in the polymer, the incipient fragments arising by pathways (1)–(3) may form ion–molecule complexes that survive long enough to permit inter‐fragment hydrogen atom, proton, or hydride transfers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 30:523–559, 2011

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mas.20282

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Wesdemiotis, C., Solak, N., Polce, M. J., Dabney, D. E., Chaicharoen, K., & Katzenmeyer, B. C.
Venue
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-08
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
523-559
ISSN
  • 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2787
OpenAlex
W1985474359
Cited by
207
References
2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20282
The paper
Wesdemiotis, C., Solak, N., Polce, M. J., Dabney, D. E., Chaicharoen, K., & Katzenmeyer, B. C. (2011). Fragmentation pathways of polymer ions. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.