Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing‐off in Parkinson's disease: Comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment

Stacy, Mark, Bowron, Annette, Guttman, Mark, Hauser, Robert, Hughes, Kim, Larsen, Jan Petter, LeWitt, Peter, Oertel, Wolfgang, Quinn, Niall, Sethi, Kapil, Stocchi, Fabrizio·2005·Movement Disorders

Abstract

This study compares the sensitivity of a Patient Questionnaire versus information gathered by clinicians at a routine clinic visit in recognizing symptoms of wearing‐off in early Parkinson's disease (PD). This Patient Questionnaire, containing 32 items representing a wide spectrum of motor and nonmotor wearing‐off symptoms, was administered to subjects attending two PD clinics. The Patient Questionnaire results were compared to the information gathered by the clinician from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV, Question 36 and from a specific Clinical Assessment Question regarding loss of medication efficacy, wearing‐off, sleepiness, dyskinesias, psychiatric complications, morning akinesia, other dopaminergic side effects, or none of the above. Examiners were blinded to study hypothesis and survey contents. Three hundred consecutive subjects with PD of <5 years duration were evaluated; the mean subject age was 72 ± 9.6 years and 60.2% were men. Subjects reporting wearing‐off were significantly younger (69.9 vs. 74.7 years) and differed regarding duration of PD symptoms (3.7 vs. 3.1 years). Wearing‐off was found in 181 subjects (62.6%) by one or more of the three measures. The most sensitive tool was the Patient Questionnaire, with 165 subjects (57.1%) indicating symptoms of wearing‐off. Question 36 of the UPDRS was positive in 127 subjects (43.9%), and the Clinical Assessment Question identified 85 subjects (29.4%) as experiencing wearing‐off. All of these results were found to differ significantly. The mean number of wearing‐off symptoms reported by the 165 subjects indicating wearing‐off on the clinical survey was 6.25, with tremor being the most common motor feature and tiredness the most common nonmotor feature. © 2005 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.20383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Stacy, M., Bowron, A., Guttman, M., Hauser, R., Hughes, K., Larsen, J. P., LeWitt, P., Oertel, W., Quinn, N., Sethi, K., & Stocchi, F.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-17
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
726-733
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2120944446
Cited by
246
References
1
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing‐off in Parkinson's disease: Comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.20383
The paper
Stacy, M., Bowron, A., Guttman, M., Hauser, R., Hughes, K., Larsen, J. P., LeWitt, P., Oertel, W., Quinn, N., Sethi, K., & Stocchi, F. (2005). Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing‐off in Parkinson's disease: Comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.