The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dual‐tasking effects on gait variability: The role of aging, falls, and executive function
Abstract
The objectives of the present study were to test the hypothesis that the dual‐tasking effect on gait variability is larger in healthy older adults than it is in healthy young adults; that this effect is larger in idiopathic elderly fallers than it is in healthy older adults; and that the dual‐tasking effects on gait variability are correlated with executive function (EF). Young adults and older adults who were classified as fallers and nonfallers were studied. Gait speed, swing time, and swing time variability, a marker of fall risk, were measured during usual walking and during three different dual‐tasking conditions. EF and memory were evaluated. When performing dual tasks, all three groups significantly decreased their gait speed. Dual tasking did not affect swing time variability in the young adults and in the nonfallers. Conversely, dual tasking markedly increased swing time variability in the fallers. While memory was similar in fallers and nonfallers, EF was different. The faller‐specific response to dual tasking was significantly correlated with tests of EF. These findings demonstrate that dual tasking does not affect the gait variability of elderly nonfallers or young adults. In contrast, dual tasking destabilizes the gait of idiopathic elderly fallers, an effect that appears to be mediated in part by a decline in EF. © 2006 Movement Disorder Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
Society, A. G., Society, G., Of, A. A., & On Falls Prevention, O. S. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x · Cited by 2,242
Frenkel-Toledo, S., Giladi, N., Peretz, C., Herman, T., Gruendlinger, L., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2005) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-2-23 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications
Amboni, M., Barone, P., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25674 · Cited by 565
Self-citationMirelman, A., Maidan, I., Herman, T., Deutsch, J. E., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2011) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glq201 · Cited by 418
Self-citationBeijersbergen, C. M. I., Granacher, U., Vandervoort, A. A., DeVita, P., & Hortobágyi, T. (2013) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2013.03.001 · Cited by 136
Mayson, D. J., Kiely, D. K., LaRose, S. I., & Bean, J. F. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e31818dfee5 · Cited by 75
Age-related changes of arm movements in dual task condition when walking on different surfaces
Hsieh, Y.-J., & Cho, C.-Y. (2012) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.01.005 · Cited by 11
The Effects of Cognition and Vision While Walking in Younger and Older Adults
Pham, T., Suen, M., Cho, Y.-H., & Krishnan, V. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24237789 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Springer, S., Giladi, N., Peretz, C., Yogev, G., Simon, E. S., & Hausdorff, J. M.
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 950-957
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2040821793
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 72.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.