The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument
Abstract
Many patients with assumed idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) may actually represent an early clinical manifestation of an evolving neurodegenerative disorder, such as the α‐synucleinopathies, Parkinson's disease or multiple system atrophy. Early detection of these patients is clinically relevant for long‐term prospective as well as future neuroprotective studies. For this purpose, we validated a 10‐item patient self‐rating questionnaire (maximum total score 13 points) covering the clinical features of RBD. The RBD screening questionnaire (RBDSQ) was applied to 54 patients with polysomnographically confirmed RBD (29 men; mean age 53.7 ± 15.8 years), 160 control subjects (81 men; mean age 50.8 ± 15.5 years) in whom RBD was excluded by history and polysomnography (PSG, control group 1) and 133 unselected healthy subjects (58 men; mean age 46.9 ± 12.3 years; no PSG, control group 2). In most subjects (n = 153) of control group 1, other sleep‐wake disturbances were present. The mean RBDSQ score in the RBD group was 9.5 ± 2.8 points compared with 4.6 ± 3.0 points in control group 1 (P < 0.0001). Considering an RBDSQ score of five points as a positive test result, we found a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity of 0.56. The RBDSQ poorly discriminated patients with the most challenging differential diagnoses such as sleepwalking or epilepsy. In control group 2, the mean RBDSQ score (2.02 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than in the RBD group (P < 0.0005), revealing a specificity of 0.92. Due to its high sensitivity, the RBDSQ appears to be particularly useful as a screening tool. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schenck, C. H., & Mahowald, M. W. (2002) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/25.2.120 · Cited by 770
Cited by
Brain-first versus body-first Parkinson’s disease: a multimodal imaging case-control study
Horsager, J., Andersen, K. B., Knudsen, K., Skjærbæk, C., Fedorova, T. D., Okkels, N., Schaeffer, E., Bonkat, S. K., Geday, J., Otto, M., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa238 · Cited by 782
Boeve, B. F., Silber, M. H., Ferman, T. J., Lin, S. C., Benarroch, E. E., Schmeichel, A. M., Ahlskog, J. E., Caselli, R. J., Jacobson, S., Sabbagh, M., et al. (2013) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2012.10.015 · Cited by 393
Gut microbiota in Parkinson's disease: Temporal stability and relations to disease progression
Aho, V. T. E., Pereira, P. A. B., Voutilainen, S., Paulin, L., Pekkonen, E., Auvinen, P., & Scheperjans, F. (2019) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.064 · Cited by 361
Knudsen, K., Fedorova, T. D., Hansen, A. K., Sommerauer, M., Otto, M., Svendsen, K. B., Nahimi, A., Stokholm, M. G., Pavese, N., Beier, C. P., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30162-5 · Cited by 309
Prashanth, R., Dutta Roy, S., Mandal, P. K., & Ghosh, S. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.001 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Stiasny‐Kolster, K., Mayer, G., Schäfer, S., Möller, J. C., Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, M., & Oertel, W. H.
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2386-2393
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2145850223
- Cited by
- 1,060
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.21740
- The paper
- Stiasny‐Kolster, K., Mayer, G., Schäfer, S., Möller, J. C., Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, M., & Oertel, W. H. (2007). The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.