Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,060

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument

Stiasny‐Kolster, Karin, Mayer, Geert, Schäfer, Sylvia, Möller, Jens Carsten, Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, Monika, Oertel, Wolfgang H.·2007·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Many patients with assumed idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) may actually represent an early clinical manifestation of an evolving neurodegenerative disorder, such as the α‐synucleinopathies, Parkinson's disease or multiple system atrophy. Early detection of these patients is clinically relevant for long‐term prospective as well as future neuroprotective studies. For this purpose, we validated a 10‐item patient self‐rating questionnaire (maximum total score 13 points) covering the clinical features of RBD. The RBD screening questionnaire (RBDSQ) was applied to 54 patients with polysomnographically confirmed RBD (29 men; mean age 53.7 ± 15.8 years), 160 control subjects (81 men; mean age 50.8 ± 15.5 years) in whom RBD was excluded by history and polysomnography (PSG, control group 1) and 133 unselected healthy subjects (58 men; mean age 46.9 ± 12.3 years; no PSG, control group 2). In most subjects (n = 153) of control group 1, other sleep‐wake disturbances were present. The mean RBDSQ score in the RBD group was 9.5 ± 2.8 points compared with 4.6 ± 3.0 points in control group 1 (P < 0.0001). Considering an RBDSQ score of five points as a positive test result, we found a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity of 0.56. The RBDSQ poorly discriminated patients with the most challenging differential diagnoses such as sleepwalking or epilepsy. In control group 2, the mean RBDSQ score (2.02 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than in the RBD group (P < 0.0005), revealing a specificity of 0.92. Due to its high sensitivity, the RBDSQ appears to be particularly useful as a screening tool. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.21740

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,060

Metadata

Authors
Stiasny‐Kolster, K., Mayer, G., Schäfer, S., Möller, J. C., Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, M., & Oertel, W. H.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-15
Volume
22
Issue
16
Pages
2386-2393
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2145850223
Cited by
1,060
References
1
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.21740
The paper
Stiasny‐Kolster, K., Mayer, G., Schäfer, S., Möller, J. C., Heinzel‐Gutenbrunner, M., & Oertel, W. H. (2007). The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.