Cited by 244Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

High-accuracy detection of early Parkinson’s disease through multimodal features and machine learning

Prashanth, R., Dutta Roy, Sumantra, Mandal, Pravat K., Ghosh, Shantanu·2016·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Early (or preclinical) diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is crucial for its early management as by the time manifestation of clinical symptoms occur, more than 60% of the dopaminergic neurons have already been lost. It is now established that there exists a premotor stage, before the start of these classic motor symptoms, characterized by a constellation of clinical features, mostly non-motor in nature such as Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behaviour Disorder (RBD) and olfactory loss. In this paper, we use the non-motor features of RBD and olfactory loss, along with other significant biomarkers such as Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements and dopaminergic imaging markers from 183 healthy normal and 401 early PD subjects, as obtained from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database, to classify early PD subjects from normal using Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Boosted Trees and Random Forests classifiers. We observe that SVM classifier gave the best performance (96.40% accuracy, 97.03% sensitivity, 95.01% specificity, and 98.88% area under ROC). We infer from the study that a combination of non-motor, CSF and imaging markers may aid in the preclinical diagnosis of PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.001

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prashanth, R., Dutta Roy, S., Mandal, P. K., & Ghosh, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Prashanth, R.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
90
Pages
13-21
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290432223
Cited by
244
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Michael J
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, early diagnosis, preclinical diagnosis, REM sleep behavior disorder, olfactory loss, non-motor symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, multimodal fusion, Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, support vector machine, classifier comparison
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Olfaction Disorders, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Models, Statistical, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Databases, Factual, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review