Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parkinson's disease‐cognitive rating scale: A new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease

Pagonabarraga, Javier, Kulisevsky, Jaime, Llebaria, Gisela, García‐Sánchez, Carmen, Pascual‐Sedano, Berta, Gironell, Alexandre·2008·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive defects associated with cortical pathology may be a marker of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD). There is a need to improve the diagnostic criteria of PD dementia (PDD) and to clarify the cognitive impairment patterns associated with PD. Current neuropsychological batteries designed for PD are focused on fronto‐subcortical deficits but are not sensitive for cortical dysfunction. We developed a new scale, the Parkinson's Disease‐Cognitive Rating Scale (PD‐CRS), that was designed to cover the full spectrum of cognitive defects associated with PD. We prospectively studied 92 PD patients [30 cognitively intact (CogInt), 30 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 32 PDD] and 61 matched controls who completed the PD‐CRS and neuropsychological tests assessing the cognitive domains included in the PD‐CRS. Acceptability, construct validity, reliability, and the discriminative properties of the PD‐CRS were examined. The PD‐CRS included items assessing fronto‐subcortical defects and items assessing cortical dysfunction. Construct validity, test‐retest and inter‐rater reliability of PD‐CRS total scores showed an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.70. The PD‐CRS showed an excellent test accuracy to diagnose PDD (sensitivity 94%, specificity 94%). The PD‐CRS total scores and confrontation naming item scores‐assessing “cortical” dysfunction—independently differentiated PDD from non‐demented PD. Alternating verbal fluency and delayed verbal memory independently differentiated the MCI group from both controls and CogInt. The PD‐CRS appeared to be a reliable and valid PD‐specific battery that accurately diagnosed PDD and detected subtle fronto‐subcortical deficits. Performance on the PD‐CRS showed that PDD is characterized by the addition of cortical dysfunction upon a predominant and progressive fronto‐subcortical impairment. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.22007

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Pagonabarraga, J., Kulisevsky, J., Llebaria, G., García‐Sánchez, C., Pascual‐Sedano, B., & Gironell, A.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-31
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
998-1005
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2155558741
Cited by
344
References
59
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parkinson's disease‐cognitive rating scale: A new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.22007
The paper
Pagonabarraga, J., Kulisevsky, J., Llebaria, G., García‐Sánchez, C., Pascual‐Sedano, B., & Gironell, A. (2008). Parkinson's disease‐cognitive rating scale: A new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.