Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The phenotypic spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective multicenter study of 100 definite cases

Respondek, Gesine, Stamelou, Maria, Kurz, Carolin, Ferguson, Leslie W., Rajput, Alexander, Chiu, Wan Zheng, van Swieten, John C., Troakes, Claire, al Sarraj, Safa, Gelpi, Ellen, Gaig, Carles, Tolosa, Eduardo, Oertel, Wolfgang H., Giese, Armin, Roeber, Sigrun, Arzberger, Thomas, Wagenpfeil, Stefan, Höglinger, Günter U., for the Movement Disorder Society—endorsed PSP Study Group·2014·Movement Disorders

Abstract

The phenotypic variability of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may account for its frequent misdiagnosis, in particular in early stages of the disease. However, large multicenter studies to define the frequency and natural history of PSP phenotypes are missing. In a cohort of 100 autopsy‐confirmed patients we studied the phenotypic spectrum of PSP by retrospective chart review. Patients were derived from five brain banks with expertise in neurodegenerative disorders with referrals from multiple academic hospitals. The clinical characteristics of the 100 cases showed remarkable heterogeneity. Most strikingly, only 24% of cases presented as Richardson's Syndrome (RS), and more than half of the cases either showed overlapping features of several predescribed phenotypes, or features not fitting proposed classification criteria for PSP phenotypes. Classification of patients according to predominant clinical features in the first 2 years of the disease course allowed a more comprehensive description of the phenotypic spectrum. These predominance types differed significantly with regard to survival time and frequency of cognitive deficits. In summary, the phenotypic spectrum of PSP may be broader and more variable than previously described in single‐center studies. Thus, too strict clinical criteria defining distinct phenotypes may not reflect this variability. A more pragmatic clinical approach using predominance types could potentially be more helpful in the early recognition of and for making prognostic predictions for these patients. Given the limitations arising from the retrospective nature of this analysis, a systematic validation in a prospective cohort study is imperative. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.26054

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Respondek, G., Stamelou, M., Kurz, C., Ferguson, L. W., Rajput, A., Chiu, W. Z., van Swieten, J. C., Troakes, C., al Sarraj, S., Gelpi, E., Gaig, C., Tolosa, E., Oertel, W. H., Giese, A., Roeber, S., Arzberger, T., Wagenpfeil, S., Höglinger, G. U., & for the Movement Disorder Society—endorsed PSP Study Group
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
29
Issue
14
Pages
1758-1766
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2152047920
Cited by
384
References
29
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phenotypic spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective multicenter study of 100 definite cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.26054
The paper
Respondek, G., Stamelou, M., Kurz, C., Ferguson, L. W., Rajput, A., Chiu, W. Z., van Swieten, J. C., Troakes, C., al Sarraj, S., Gelpi, E., Gaig, C., Tolosa, E., Oertel, W. H., Giese, A., Roeber, S., Arzberger, T., Wagenpfeil, S., Höglinger, G. U., & for the Movement Disorder Society—endorsed PSP Study Group. (2014). The phenotypic spectrum of progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective multicenter study of 100 definite cases. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26054

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.