The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic variability of the retromer cargo recognition complex in parkinsonism
Abstract
Background: A pathogenic mutation (VPS35 p.D620N) within the retromer complex has been shown to segregate with late‐onset Parkinson's disease (PD). Several studies have subsequently detected the mutation in patients with PD and not in controls. Methods: Mutation screening of the coding regions of the retromer cargo recognition complex genes ( VPS26A/B , VPS29 , and VPS35 ) was carried out in patients with PD (n = 396), atypical parkinsonism (n = 229), and in 368 controls. Results: Overall, we identified five rare nonsynonymous mutations in VPS26A and one in VPS35 ; none were observed in VPS26B or VPS29 . Three VPS26A variants (p.K93E, p.M112V, and p.K297X), identified in patients with atypical parkinsonism, were not observed in controls from this study (n = 368) or from publically available data sets (n = 4,426). Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that rare variants in the retromer complex genes may be involved in the development of parkinsonism, although further studies are warranted before any solid conclusions can be drawn. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genetic studies have identified many genes associated with the endosomal network as causal for neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
“Genetic studies have identified many genes associated with the endosomal network to be causal for numerous neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mds.25145 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.3367 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d5f2 · DOI
- 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101155 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.10.032 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddu178 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms4828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/09687688.2010.522601 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.00156-06 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/hmg/ddr158 · DOI
- 10.1086/510782 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.20667 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0317167100031814 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.47.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkq603 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb1103 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00702-014-1179-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Retromer Complex: From Genesis to Revelations
Seaman, M. N. J. (2021) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.12.009 · Cited by 104
Jones, E., Adams, H., Chen, K.-E., Maroof, F., Ibbotson, T. M., Nakamura, Y., Banks, P. J., Healy, M. D., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., et al. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.14.724903
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustavsson, E. K., Guella, I., Trinh, J., Szu‐Tu, C., Rajput, A., Rajput, A. H., Steele, J. C., McKeown, M., Jeon, B. S., Aasly, J. O., & Farrer, M. J.
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-584
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
- 1531-8257
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review