Cited by 43Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Dyskinesia detection and monitoring by a single sensor in patients with Parkinson's disease

Lopane, Giovanna, Mellone, Sabato, Chiari, Lorenzo, Cortelli, Pietro, Calandra‐Buonaura, Giovanna, Contin, Manuela·2015·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Objective: In current clinical practice, assessment of levodopa‐induced dyskinesias (LIDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on semiquantitative scales or patients’ diaries. We aimed to assess the feasibility, clinical validity, and usability of a waist‐worn inertial sensor for discriminating between LIDs and physiological sway in both supervised and unsupervised settings. Methods: Forty‐six PD patients on l‐dopa therapy, 18 de novo PD patients, and 18 healthy controls were enrolled. Patients underwent clinical assessment of motor signs and dyskinesias and kinetic‐dynamic l‐dopa monitoring, tracked by serial measurements of plasma drug concentrations and motor and postural tests. Results: A subset of features was selected, which showed excellent reliability. Sensitivity and specificity of the selected features for dyskinesia recognition were assessed in both supervised and unsupervised settings with an accuracy of 95% and 86%, respectively. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that it is feasible to design a reliable sensor‐based application for dyskinesia monitoring at home. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.26313

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopane, G., Mellone, S., Chiari, L., Cortelli, P., Calandra‐Buonaura, G., & Contin, M.
Affiliations
  • Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • IRCCS–Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna Bologna Italy
Corresponding author
Contin, Manuela
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
1267-1271
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W1767762454
Cited by
43
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
levodopa-induced dyskinesia, Parkinson's disease, inertial sensors, postural sway, L-dopa therapy, home monitoring, sensor-based detection
MeSH terms
Antiparkinson Agents, Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced, Female, Humans, Levodopa, Male, Parkinson Disease, Posture, Psychomotor Performance, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review