Cited by 97Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological diseases and metabolism

A controlled trial of idebenone in Huntington's disease

Ranen, Neal G., Peyser, Carol E., Coyle, Joseph T., Bylsma, Frederick W., Sherr, Meeia, Day, Leslie, Folstein, Marshal F., Brandt, Jason +2 more·1996·Movement Disorders

Abstract

One hundred patients with clinically diagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) were randomized to either idebenone, an antioxidant and enhancer of oxidative metabolism, or placebo, in a 1‐year, double‐blind, parallel‐group study aimed at slowing the rate of progression of the disease. Ninety‐one patients completed the study. There were no significant differences between groups on the primary outcome measures of the Huntington's Disease Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL—an index of functional status) and the Quantified Neurologic Examination (QNE). Sample size calculations based on progression of the ADL and QNE in this study group revealed that a larger study group is necessary to detect any differences less than an almost complete halting of the disease. This argues for multicenter efforts for future therapeutic trials in HD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.870110510

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no significant improvement in a small trial of idebenone in HD.

    “There was no significant improvement in a small trial in HD171.”

    From Mitochondrial Approaches for Neuroprotection (2008) · cites this paper as [171]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ranen, N. G., Peyser, C. E., Coyle, J. T., Bylsma, F. W., Sherr, M., Day, L., Folstein, M. F., Brandt, J., Ross, C. A., & Folstein, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Ranen, Neal G.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
549-554
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2036012667
Cited by
97
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS016375)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
idebenone, Huntington's disease, disease progression, antioxidant therapy, oxidative metabolism, functional status, sample size determination
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Antioxidants, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Huntington Disease, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Ubiquinone, Benzoquinones, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Glutamate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review