Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

De novo administration of ropinirole and bromocriptine induces less dyskinesia than L‐dopa in the MPTP‐treated marmoset

Pearce, Ronald K. B., Banerji, Tara, Jenner, Peter, David Marsden, C.·1998·Movement Disorders

Abstract

In contrast to levodopa (L‐dopa), de novo administration of the D2‐like receptor agonist bromocriptine to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or to 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)‐treated subhuman primates is not associated with the onset of significant dyskinesia. We now compare the ability of the novel D2‐like selective dopamine agonist ropinirole with that of bromocriptine and L‐dopa to induce dyskinesia in MPTP‐treated common marmosets. MPTP‐treated common marmosets were treated with placebo, L‐dopa plus carbidopa, ropinirole, or bromocriptine daily for 30 days (n = 4 per group) in doses that were titrated to similarly increase locomotion and improve motor disability. L‐dopa rapidly induced dyskinesia of moderate to severe intensity, whereas ropinirole and bromocriptine produced mild dyskinesia over the course of the study that was significantly less severe than in the L‐dopa‐treated group (p < 0.05). However, in a separate group of marmosets previously primed with L‐dopa to exhibit dyskinesia, ropinirole administration elicited severe dyskinesias comparable with that of L‐dopa in a dosedependent fashion. Ropinirole, in common with bromocriptine, has a lesser tendency than L‐dopa to produce dyskinesia while similarly improving motor performance in drug‐naive MPTP‐treated marmosets. However, in common with other dopamine agonists, ropinirole will elicit comparable dyskinesia once L‐dopa priming has occurred. These results predict a similar response to ropinirole and other long‐acting dopamine agonists in L‐dopa‐naive patients with PD and emphasize the importance of avoiding initial dyskinesia induction through early use of dopamine agonist drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.870130207

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Pearce, R. K. B., Banerji, T., Jenner, P., & David Marsden, C.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
234-241
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2149958198
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De novo administration of ropinirole and bromocriptine induces less dyskinesia than L‐dopa in the MPTP‐treated marmoset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.870130207
The paper
Pearce, R. K. B., Banerji, T., Jenner, P., & David Marsden, C. (1998). De novo administration of ropinirole and bromocriptine induces less dyskinesia than L‐dopa in the MPTP‐treated marmoset. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870130207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.