Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QT prolongation through hERG K+ channel blockade: Current knowledge and strategies for the early prediction during drug development

Recanatini, Maurizio, Poluzzi, Elisabetta, Masetti, Matteo, Cavalli, Andrea, De Ponti, Fabrizio·2005·Medicinal Research Reviews

Abstract

Prolongation of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram is a typical effect of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs, achieved through blockade of potassium channels. In the past decade, evidence has accrued that several classes of drugs used for non‐cardiovascular indications may prolong the QT interval with the same mechanism (namely, human ether‐à‐go‐go‐related gene (hERG) K+ channel blockade). The great interest in QT prolongation is because of several reasons. First, drug‐induced QT prolongation increases the likelihood of a polymorphous ventricular arrhythmia (namely, torsades de pointes, TdP), which may cause syncope and degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. Second, the fact that several classes of drugs, such as antihistamines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and neuroleptics may cause the long QT syndrome (LQTS) raises the question whether this is a class effect (e.g., shared by all agents of a given pharmacological class) or a specific effect of single agents within a class. There is now consensus that, in most cases, only a few agents within a therapeutic class share the ability to significantly affect hERG K+ channels. These compounds should be identified as early as possible during drug development. Third, QT prolongation and interaction with hERG K+ channels have become surrogate markers of cardiotoxicity and have received increasing regulatory attention. This review briefly outlines the mechanisms leading to QT prolongation and the different strategies that can be followed to predict this unwanted effect. In particular, it will focus on the approaches recently proposed for the in silico screening of new compounds. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/med.20019

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Recanatini, M., Poluzzi, E., Masetti, M., Cavalli, A., & De Ponti, F.
Venue
Medicinal Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-16
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
133-166
ISSN
  • 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1128
OpenAlex
W2107375130
Cited by
285
References
131
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QT prolongation through hERG K+ channel blockade: Current knowledge and strategies for the early prediction during drug development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/med.20019
The paper
Recanatini, M., Poluzzi, E., Masetti, M., Cavalli, A., & De Ponti, F. (2005). QT prolongation through hERG K+ channel blockade: Current knowledge and strategies for the early prediction during drug development. Medicinal Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.20019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.