Cited by 2,313Computational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Reaction MechanismsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure

Hansch, Corwin., Fujita, Toshio.·1964·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTp-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical StructureCorwin. Hansch and Toshio. FujitaCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 8, 1616–1626Publication Date (Print):April 1, 1964Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 April 1964https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01062a035https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01062a035research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views4630Altmetric-Citations1842LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja01062a035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • QSAR was the first systematic application of machine learning to design small molecules with desired properties.

    “Developed from the work of Hansch and Fujita in the 1960s (77), QSAR was the first systematic application of machine learning to design small molecules with desired properties (78).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansch, C., & Fujita, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1964-04
Volume
86
Issue
8
Pages
1616-1626
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2052226480
Cited by
2,313
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 72
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
biological activity, molecular structure, structure-activity relationship, Hansch analysis, molecular descriptors, substituent effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review