Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine intelligence in peptide therapeutics: A next‐generation tool for rapid disease screening

Basith, Shaherin, Manavalan, Balachandran, Hwan Shin, Tae, Lee, Gwang·2020·Medicinal Research Reviews

Abstract

Discovery and development of biopeptides are time‐consuming, laborious, and dependent on various factors. Data‐driven computational methods, especially machine learning (ML) approach, can rapidly and efficiently predict the utility of therapeutic peptides. ML methods offer an array of tools that can accelerate and enhance decision making and discovery for well‐defined queries with ample and sophisticated data quality. Various ML approaches, such as support vector machines, random forest, extremely randomized tree, and more recently deep learning methods, are useful in peptide‐based drug discovery. These approaches leverage the peptide data sets, created via high‐throughput sequencing and computational methods, and enable the prediction of functional peptides with increased levels of accuracy. The use of ML approaches in the development of peptide‐based therapeutics is relatively recent; however, these techniques are already revolutionizing protein research by unraveling their novel therapeutic peptide functions. In this review, we discuss several ML‐based state‐of‐the‐art peptide‐prediction tools and compare these methods in terms of their algorithms, feature encodings, prediction scores, evaluation methodologies, and software utilities. We also assessed the prediction performance of these methods using well‐constructed independent data sets. In addition, we discuss the common pitfalls and challenges of using ML approaches for peptide therapeutics. Overall, we show that using ML models in peptide research can streamline the development of targeted peptide therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/med.21658

Cites

218 of 218 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 218 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Basith, S., Manavalan, B., Hwan Shin, T., & Lee, G.
Venue
Medicinal Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
1276-1314
ISSN
  • 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1128
OpenAlex
W2999580270
Cited by
312
References
218
FWCI
22.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine intelligence in peptide therapeutics: A next‐generation tool for rapid disease screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/med.21658
The paper
Basith, S., Manavalan, B., Hwan Shin, T., & Lee, G. (2020). Machine intelligence in peptide therapeutics: A next‐generation tool for rapid disease screening. Medicinal Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21658

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.