A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory
Abstract
Twitter is a fast growing real‐time social media tool. As Twitter evolves, more and more people are partaking in sharing what is happening around the world through various Twitter applications. Hashtag use has become a unique tagging convention to help associate Twitter messages with certain events or contexts. Prefixed by a # symbol with a keyword, a Twitter hashtag serves as a bottom‐up user‐proposed tagging convention. It also embodies user participation in the process of hashtag innovation, especially as it pertains to information organization tasks. Diffusion of innovation (DoI) is a theory that helps to explain the adoption process of an innovation by modeling its entire life cycle according to the aspects of communications and human information interactions. Hence, diffusion theory offers valuable insights into interface design that supports Twitter hashtag use and access. It also assists in evaluating hashtag life cycles and thus offering information required for decision‐making, in regard to hashtag management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twitter's affordances allow large-scale real-time information exchange and collective sense-making through shared hashtags.
“Twitter has unique affordances that enable real-time information exchange on a large scale and collective sense-making based on shared sets of hashtags (Chang, 2010).”
From Understanding user responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter from a terror management theory perspective: Cultural differences among the US, UK and India (2022) · cites this paper as Chang, 2010
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kwon, S., & Park, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Among various social networking sites, Twitter has unique affordances that enable real-time information exchange on a large scale and collective sense-making based on shared sets of hashtags (Chang, 2010).”
- Authors
- Chang, H.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Hsia‐Ching
- ORCID
- Chang, Hsia‐Ching
- Venue
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0044-7870 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8390
- OpenAlex
- W1987381877
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Keywords
- Twitter hashtags, diffusion of innovation theory, information organization, user participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review