A Molecular Representation to Identify Isofunctional Molecules
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The challenges of drug discovery from hit identification to clinical development sometimes involves addressing scaffold hopping issues, in order to optimise molecular biological activity or ADME properties, or mitigate toxicology concerns of a drug candidate. Docking is usually viewed as the method of choice for identification of isofunctional molecules, i. e. highly dissimilar molecules that share common binding modes with a protein target. However, the structure of the protein may not be suitable for docking because of a low resolution, or may even be unknown. This problem is frequently encountered in the case of membrane proteins, although they constitute an important category of the druggable proteome. In such cases, ligand‐based approaches offer promise but are often inadequate to handle large‐step scaffold hopping, because they usually rely on molecular structure. Therefore, we propose the Interaction Fingerprints Profile (IFPP), a molecular representation that captures molecules binding modes based on docking experiments against a panel of diverse high‐quality proteins structures. Evaluation on the LH benchmark demonstrates the interest of IFPP for identification of isofunctional molecules. Nevertheless, computation of IFPPs is expensive, which limits its scalability for screening very large molecular libraries. We propose to overcome this limitation by leveraging Metric Learning approaches, allowing fast estimation of molecules IFPP similarities, thus providing an efficient pre‐screening strategy that in applicable to very large molecular libraries. Overall, our results suggest that IFPP provides an interesting and complementary tool alongside existing methods, in order to address challenging scaffold hopping problems effectively in drug discovery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
The opportunities of mining historical and collective data in drug discovery
Wassermann, A. M., Lounkine, E., Davies, J. W., Glick, M., & Camargo, L. M. (2015) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.004 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Pinel, P., Guichaoua, G., Devaux, N., Gaston‐Mathé, Y., Hoffmann, B., & Stoven, V.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Iktos SA 65 rue de Prony 75017 Paris France
- Corresponding author
- Stoven, Véronique
- Venue
- Molecular Informatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e202400159-e202400159
- ISSN
- 1868-1743 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-1751
- OpenAlex
- W4408546666
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Informatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- scaffold hopping, molecular representation, ligand-based drug discovery, membrane proteins, protein-ligand docking, metric learning, molecular similarity
- MeSH terms
- Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review