Cited by 1Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Degradation and InhibitorsMachine Learning in Materials Science

A Molecular Representation to Identify Isofunctional Molecules

Open access
Pinel, Philippe, Guichaoua, Gwenn, Devaux, Nicolas, Gaston‐Mathé, Yann, Hoffmann, Brice, Stoven, Véronique·2025·Molecular Informatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The challenges of drug discovery from hit identification to clinical development sometimes involves addressing scaffold hopping issues, in order to optimise molecular biological activity or ADME properties, or mitigate toxicology concerns of a drug candidate. Docking is usually viewed as the method of choice for identification of isofunctional molecules, i. e. highly dissimilar molecules that share common binding modes with a protein target. However, the structure of the protein may not be suitable for docking because of a low resolution, or may even be unknown. This problem is frequently encountered in the case of membrane proteins, although they constitute an important category of the druggable proteome. In such cases, ligand‐based approaches offer promise but are often inadequate to handle large‐step scaffold hopping, because they usually rely on molecular structure. Therefore, we propose the Interaction Fingerprints Profile (IFPP), a molecular representation that captures molecules binding modes based on docking experiments against a panel of diverse high‐quality proteins structures. Evaluation on the LH benchmark demonstrates the interest of IFPP for identification of isofunctional molecules. Nevertheless, computation of IFPPs is expensive, which limits its scalability for screening very large molecular libraries. We propose to overcome this limitation by leveraging Metric Learning approaches, allowing fast estimation of molecules IFPP similarities, thus providing an efficient pre‐screening strategy that in applicable to very large molecular libraries. Overall, our results suggest that IFPP provides an interesting and complementary tool alongside existing methods, in order to address challenging scaffold hopping problems effectively in drug discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/minf.202400159

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pinel, P., Guichaoua, G., Devaux, N., Gaston‐Mathé, Y., Hoffmann, B., & Stoven, V.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Iktos SA 65 rue de Prony 75017 Paris France
Corresponding author
Stoven, Véronique
Venue
Molecular Informatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
e202400159-e202400159
ISSN
  • 1868-1743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-1751
OpenAlex
W4408546666
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
scaffold hopping, molecular representation, ligand-based drug discovery, membrane proteins, protein-ligand docking, metric learning, molecular similarity
MeSH terms
Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review