Cited by 57Tea Polyphenols and EffectsSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Sensory evaluation of the synergism among odorants present in concentrations below their odor threshold in a Chinese jasmine green tea infusion

Ito, Yuriko, Kubota, Kikue·2005·Molecular Nutrition & Food Research

Abstract

The mechanism for the contribution of subthreshold aroma constituents to the overall jasmine tea odor impression was studied on the basis of a sensory evaluation. Binary model aqueous solutions containing the authentic odorants of a jasmine tea infusion, (E)-2-hexenyl hexanoate (I), (Z)-3-hexenol (II), and indole (III), were each prepared in a concentration below the odor threshold. Each solution had no aroma, but when 4-hexanolide replaced only 5% of each odorant, the odor intensity of each model solution was significantly strengthened. An astringent note and heavy note were recognized for each solution as the commonly perceived characteristics from the sensory evaluation. The concentration of 4-hexanolide added was also at the subthreshold level. The results suggest mutual interaction between odorants I, II, or III and 4-hexanolide. The effect on the overall odor sensation of a jasmine tea infusion by adding 4-hexanolide at a concentration below its odor threshold was also studied. In this case, the intensity of both the sweet and astringent notes was significantly strengthened in comparison with the odor impression of the original jasmine tea infusion. This phenomenon is considered to have been a synergistic effect between subthreshold odor compounds in the jasmine tea infusion. The results of this study clarify for the first time that the subthreshold aroma constituents play an important role in the characteristic flavor of a jasmine tea infusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mnfr.200400021

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ito, Y., & Kubota, K.
Affiliations
Ochanomizu University (JP)
Venue
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
61-68
ISSN
  • 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4133
OpenAlex
W2027193315
Cited by
57
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
odor threshold, (Z)-3-hexenol, indole, sensory evaluation, astringency, flavor perception
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Drug Synergism, Female, Humans, Lactones, Odorants, Smell, Tea, Plant Leaves, Camellia sinensis, Jasminum, Flowers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review