The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The oral bioavailability of curcumin from micronized powder and liquid micelles is significantly increased in healthy humans and differs between sexes
Open accessAbstract
Scope: Curcumin revealed various health‐beneficial properties in numerous studies. However its bioavailability is low due to its limited intestinal uptake and rapid metabolism. The aim of our project was to develop novel curcumin formulations with improved oral bioavailability and to study their safety as well as potential sex‐differences. Methods and results: In this crossover study, healthy subjects (13 women, 10 men) took, in random order, a single oral dose of 500 mg curcuminoids as native powder, micronized powder, or liquid micelles. Blood and urine samples were collected for 24 h and total curcuminoids and safety parameters were quantified. Based on the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC), the micronized curcumin was 14‐, 5‐, and 9‐fold and micellar curcumin 277‐, 114‐, and 185‐fold better bioavailable than native curcumin in women, men, and all subjects, respectively. Thus, women absorbed curcumin more efficiently than men. All safety parameters remained within the reference ranges following the consumption of all formulations. Conclusion: Both, the micronized powder and in particular the liquid micellar formulation of curcumin significantly improved its oral bioavailability without altering safety parameters and may thus be ideally suited to deliver curcumin in human intervention trials. The observed sex differences in curcumin absorption warrant further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soleimani, V., Sahebkar, A., & Hosseinzadeh, H. (2018) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.6054 · Cited by 579
Saadati, S., Hatami, B., Yari, Z., Shahrbaf, M. A., Eghtesad, S., Mansour, A., Poustchi, H., Hedayati, M., Aghajanpoor-pasha, M., Sadeghi, A., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-018-0382-9 · Cited by 110
Zhu, L., Mei, X., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y., & Lang, F. (2019) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.6257 · Cited by 76
Alkhader, E., Roberts, C. J., Rosli, R., Yuen, K. H., Seow, E. K., Lee, Y. Z., & Billa, N. (2018) · Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition · doi:10.1080/09205063.2018.1541500 · Cited by 53
Zhang, Z., Chang, D., Zeng, Z., Xu, Y., Yu, J., Fan, C., Yang, C., & Chang, J. (2024) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101075 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiborr, C., Kocher, A., Behnam, D., Jandasek, J., Toelstede, S., & Frank, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 516-527
- ISSN
- 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4133
- OpenAlex
- W2073798776
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.