Cited by 76Curcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

Curcumin intervention for cognitive function in different types of people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhu, Li‐Na, Mei, Xi, Zhang, Zeng‐Guo, Xie, Ying‐ping, Lang, Fang·2019·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

Curcumin is a polyphenolic natural compound with diverse and attractive biological activities, which may prevent or ameliorate pathological processes underlying age-related cognitive decline, dementia, or mood disorders. However, clinical trials and animal studies have yielded conflicting conclusions regarding its effectiveness for cognition in different individuals. The aim of this review is to meta-analytically assess the effectiveness of curcumin for cognitive function in different types of people. A preliminary search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data and China Biology Medicine disc was performed to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of curcumin on cognition. Six clinical trials with a total of 289 subjects met inclusion criteria for this review. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized difference of means (SMD). For older adults who received curcumin, scores on measures of cognitive function (SMD = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.05, 0.62]; p = 0.02), occurrence of adverse events (odds ratio [OR] = 5.59, 95% CI [0.96, 36.80]; p = 0.05), and measures of depression (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI [0.64, 0.05]; p = 0.09) indicated significant memory improvement. In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), scores in measures of cognition status (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI [1.48, -0.32]; p = 0.002) indicated that there was a trend for treated subjects to do worse than placebo-treated subjects on the Mini-Mental State Examination. The occurrence of adverse events (OR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.10, 7.51]; p = 0.90) was similar to those who received placebo. Due to insufficient data, it was impossible to provide a narrative account of only the outcomes for schizophrenia. Curcumin appears to be more effective in improving cognitive function in the elderly than in improving symptoms of AD and schizophrenia. Curcumin is also safe and tolerated among these individuals. Because of the small number of studies available, a funnel plot or sensitivity analysis was not possible. Further high-quality trials with larger sample sizes or bioavailability-improved curcumin formulations may be considered for reliable assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.6257

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curcumin's ability to decrease amyloid-beta plaques, as well as its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, potentially explains enhanced cognitive function in curcumin-treated animal models.

    “Furthermore, various studies using animal models of AD have demonstrated enhanced cognitive function in curcumin-treated groups, potentially due to curcumin’s ability to decrease the levels of Aβ plaques, as well as its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [154,155].”
  • Various studies using animal models of Alzheimer's disease demonstrate enhanced cognitive function in curcumin-treated groups.

    “Furthermore, various studies using animal models of AD have demonstrated enhanced cognitive function in curcumin-treated groups, potentially due to curcumin’s ability to decrease the levels of Aβ plaques, as well as its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [154,155].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, L., Mei, X., Zhang, Z., Xie, Y., & Lang, F.
Affiliations
  • Weifang Medical University (CN)
  • Ningbo Kangning Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Psychology Weifang Medical University Weifang Shandong 261053 China
Corresponding author
Mei, Xi
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-21
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
524-533
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W2906114134
Cited by
76
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province (17CQSJ14)
  • Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Shandong Provincial Commission of Health and Family Planning (2017WS240)
  • Major Social Risk Prediction and Governance Collaborative Innovative Center of Weifang Medical University “Health Shandong” (XT1407001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
curcumin, cognitive function, memory enhancement, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, schizophrenia, depression, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, adverse events, polyphenols, curcumin bioavailability, Mini-Mental State Examination, treatment effect heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, China, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Curcumin, Depression, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review