The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paired cycle‐GAN‐based image correction for quantitative cone‐beam computed tomography
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The incorporation of cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has allowed for enhanced image‐guided radiation therapy. While CBCT allows for daily 3D imaging, images suffer from severe artifacts, limiting the clinical potential of CBCT. In this work, a deep learning‐based method for generating high quality corrected CBCT (CCBCT) images is proposed. Methods: The proposed method integrates a residual block concept into a cycle‐consistent adversarial network (cycle‐GAN) framework, called res‐cycle GAN, to learn a mapping between CBCT images and paired planning CT images. Compared with a GAN, a cycle‐GAN includes an inverse transformation from CBCT to CT images, which constrains the model by forcing calculation of both a CCBCT and a synthetic CBCT. A fully convolution neural network with residual blocks is used in the generator to enable end‐to‐end CBCT‐to‐CT transformations. The proposed algorithm was evaluated using 24 sets of patient data in the brain and 20 sets of patient data in the pelvis. The mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), normalized cross‐correlation (NCC) indices, and spatial non‐uniformity (SNU) were used to quantify the correction accuracy of the proposed algorithm. The proposed method is compared to both a conventional scatter correction and another machine learning‐based CBCT correction method. Results: Overall, the MAE, PSNR, NCC, and SNU were 13.0 HU, 37.5 dB, 0.99, and 0.05 in the brain, 16.1 HU, 30.7 dB, 0.98, and 0.09 in the pelvis for the proposed method, improvements of 45%, 16%, 1%, and 93% in the brain, and 71%, 38%, 2%, and 65% in the pelvis, over the CBCT image. The proposed method showed superior image quality as compared to the scatter correction method, reducing noise and artifact severity. The proposed method produced images with less noise and artifacts than the comparison machine learning‐based method. Conclusions: The authors have developed a novel deep learning‐based method to generate high‐quality corrected CBCT images. The proposed method increases onboard CBCT image quality, making it comparable to that of the planning CT. With further evaluation and clinical implementation, this method could lead to quantitative adaptive radiation therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
Fast Normalized Cross-Correlation
Yoo, J.-C., & Han, T. H. (2009) · Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/s00034-009-9130-7 · Cited by 1,115
Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter
Siewerdsen, J. H., & Jaffray, D. A. (2001) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1339879 · Cited by 612
Template matching using fast normalized cross correlation:
Briechle, K., & Hanebeck, U. D. (2001) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.421129 · Cited by 539
Ensembles of Multiple Models and Architectures for Robust Brain Tumour Segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Bai, W., Ferrante, E., McDonagh, S., Sinclair, M., Pawlowski, N., Rajchl, M., Lee, M., Kainz, B., Rueckert, D., et al. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_38 · Cited by 434
Fan, J., Wang, J., Chen, Z., Hu, C., Zhang, Z., & Hu, W. (2019) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13271 · Cited by 353
Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications
Acharya, S., Fischer-Valuck, B. W., Kashani, R., Parikh, P., Yang, D., Zhao, T., Green, O., Wooten, O., Li, H. H., Hu, Y., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.015 · Cited by 302
Estimating CT Image From MRI Data Using Structured Random Forest and Auto-Context Model
Huynh, T., Gao, Y., Kang, J., Wang, L., Zhang, P., Lian, J., & Shen, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2461533 · Cited by 282
Liang, X., Chen, L., Nguyen, D., Zhou, Z., Gu, X., Yang, M., Wang, J., & Jiang, S. (2019) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab22f9 · Cited by 262
Cited by
Deep learning in medical image registration: a review
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab843e · Cited by 661
Self-citationWang, M., Xie, P., Du, Y., & Hu, X. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13127111 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Harms, J., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Zhang, R., Zhou, J., Tang, X., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3998-4009
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2952935478
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 24.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paired cycle‐GAN‐based image correction for quantitative cone‐beam computed tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mp.13656
- The paper
- Harms, J., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Zhang, R., Zhou, J., Tang, X., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2019). Paired cycle‐GAN‐based image correction for quantitative cone‐beam computed tomography. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.