Cited by 37Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Imaging and Analysis

Endometrium segmentation on transvaginal ultrasound image using key-point discriminator

Park, Hyenok, Lee, Hong Joo, Kim, Hak Gu, Ro, Yong Man, Shin, Dongkuk, Lee, Sa Ra, Kim, Sung Hoon, Kong, Mikyung·2019·Medical Physics

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transvaginal ultrasound imaging provides useful information for diagnosing endometrial pathologies and reproductive health. Endometrium segmentation in transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) images is very challenging due to ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures. In this study, we developed a new segmentation framework which provides robust segmentation against ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures of TVUS images. METHODS: To achieve endometrium segmentation from TVUS images, we propose a new segmentation framework with a discriminator guided by four key points of the endometrium (namely, the endometrium cavity tip, the internal os of the cervix, and the two thickest points between the two basal layers on the anterior and posterior uterine walls). The key points of the endometrium are defined as meaningful points that are related to the characteristics of the endometrial morphology, namely the length and thickness of the endometrium. In the proposed segmentation framework, the key-point discriminator distinguishes a predicted segmentation map from a ground-truth segmentation map according to the key-point maps. Meanwhile, the endometrium segmentation network predicts accurate segmentation results that the key-point discriminator cannot discriminate. In this adversarial way, the key-point information containing endometrial morphology characteristics is effectively incorporated in the segmentation network. The segmentation network can accurately find the segmentation boundary while the key-point discriminator learns the shape distribution of the endometrium. Moreover, the endometrium segmentation can be robust to the heterogeneous texture of the endometrium. We conducted an experiment on a TVUS dataset that contained 3,372 sagittal TVUS images and the corresponding key points. The dataset was collected by three hospitals (Ewha Woman's University School of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, and Yonsei University College of Medicine) with the approval of the three hospitals' Institutional Review Board. For verification, fivefold cross-validation was performed. RESULT: The proposed key-point discriminator improved the performance of the endometrium segmentation, achieving 82.67 % for the Dice coefficient and 70.46% for the Jaccard coefficient. In comparison, on the TVUS images UNet, showed 58.69 % for the Dice coefficient and 41.59 % for the Jaccard coefficient. The qualitative performance of the endometrium segmentation was also improved over the conventional deep learning segmentation networks. Our experimental results indicated robust segmentation by the proposed method on TVUS images with heterogeneous texture and unclear boundary. In addition, the effect of the key-point discriminator was verified by an ablation study. CONCLUSION: We proposed a key-point discriminator to train a segmentation network for robust segmentation of the endometrium with TVUS images. By utilizing the key-point information, the proposed method showed more reliable and accurate segmentation performance and outperformed the conventional segmentation networks both in qualitative and quantitative comparisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mp.13677

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 37

Authors
Park, H., Lee, H. J., Kim, H. G., Ro, Y. M., Shin, D., Lee, S. R., Kim, S. H., & Kong, M.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Samsung Medison (South Korea) (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ro, Yong Man
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
3974-3984
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W2952509531
Cited by
37
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
transvaginal ultrasound, adversarial training, endometrial morphology, endometrial thickness, internal cervical os, uterine wall, medical image segmentation, ablation study
MeSH terms
Endometrium, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review