Endometrium segmentation on transvaginal ultrasound image using key-point discriminator
Abstract
PURPOSE: Transvaginal ultrasound imaging provides useful information for diagnosing endometrial pathologies and reproductive health. Endometrium segmentation in transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) images is very challenging due to ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures. In this study, we developed a new segmentation framework which provides robust segmentation against ambiguous boundaries and heterogeneous textures of TVUS images. METHODS: To achieve endometrium segmentation from TVUS images, we propose a new segmentation framework with a discriminator guided by four key points of the endometrium (namely, the endometrium cavity tip, the internal os of the cervix, and the two thickest points between the two basal layers on the anterior and posterior uterine walls). The key points of the endometrium are defined as meaningful points that are related to the characteristics of the endometrial morphology, namely the length and thickness of the endometrium. In the proposed segmentation framework, the key-point discriminator distinguishes a predicted segmentation map from a ground-truth segmentation map according to the key-point maps. Meanwhile, the endometrium segmentation network predicts accurate segmentation results that the key-point discriminator cannot discriminate. In this adversarial way, the key-point information containing endometrial morphology characteristics is effectively incorporated in the segmentation network. The segmentation network can accurately find the segmentation boundary while the key-point discriminator learns the shape distribution of the endometrium. Moreover, the endometrium segmentation can be robust to the heterogeneous texture of the endometrium. We conducted an experiment on a TVUS dataset that contained 3,372 sagittal TVUS images and the corresponding key points. The dataset was collected by three hospitals (Ewha Woman's University School of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, and Yonsei University College of Medicine) with the approval of the three hospitals' Institutional Review Board. For verification, fivefold cross-validation was performed. RESULT: The proposed key-point discriminator improved the performance of the endometrium segmentation, achieving 82.67 % for the Dice coefficient and 70.46% for the Jaccard coefficient. In comparison, on the TVUS images UNet, showed 58.69 % for the Dice coefficient and 41.59 % for the Jaccard coefficient. The qualitative performance of the endometrium segmentation was also improved over the conventional deep learning segmentation networks. Our experimental results indicated robust segmentation by the proposed method on TVUS images with heterogeneous texture and unclear boundary. In addition, the effect of the key-point discriminator was verified by an ablation study. CONCLUSION: We proposed a key-point discriminator to train a segmentation network for robust segmentation of the endometrium with TVUS images. By utilizing the key-point information, the proposed method showed more reliable and accurate segmentation performance and outperformed the conventional segmentation networks both in qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All but one study investigated the AI performance for the assessment of endometrial thickness, texture, or uterine adhesions.
“All but one study investigated the AI performance for the assessment of endometrial thickness, texture, or uterine adhesions [205,206,207,208].”
The performance of AI US in assessing endometrial characteristics could be further increased by setting human-selected key points in the images as a demarcation of the ROI for the AI algorithm.
“which could be further increased by setting human-selected key points in the images as a demarcation of the ROI for the AI algorithm [207].”
The need for human experts selecting images before analysis was a limiting aspect for AI application in endometrium.
“the need for human experts selecting images before analysis [205,207,209].”
Manual selection of the ROI is still a limiting aspect in AI performance for tissue analysis applications.
“In applications of tissue analysis such as assessment of the endometrium in gynecology [207,209] and fetal lung texture [162], or identification of the cervix [166] in obstetrics, manual selection of the ROI is still a limiting aspect in AI performance.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Park, H., Lee, H. J., Kim, H. G., Ro, Y. M., Shin, D., Lee, S. R., Kim, S. H., & Kong, M.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Samsung Medison (South Korea) (KR)
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- Asan Medical Center (KR)
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Ro, Yong Man
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-31
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3974-3984
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2952509531
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- transvaginal ultrasound, adversarial training, endometrial morphology, endometrial thickness, internal cervical os, uterine wall, medical image segmentation, ablation study
- MeSH terms
- Endometrium, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Ultrasonography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review