The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Resilience is a construct of increasing interest, but validated scales measuring resilience factors among adults are scarce. Here, a scale named the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) was crossvalidated and compared with measures of personality (Big Five/5PFs), cognitive abilities (Raven's Advanced Matrices, Vocabulary, Number series), and social intelligence (TSIS). All measures were given to 482 applicants for the military college. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the fit of the five-factor model, measuring 'personal strength', 'social competence', 'structured style', 'family cohesion' and 'social resources'. Using Big Five to discriminate between well adjusted and more vulnerable personality profiles, all resilience factors were positively correlated with the well adjusted personality profile. RSA-personal strength was most associated with 5PFs-emotional stability, RSA-social competence with 5PFs-extroversion and 5PFs-agreeableness, as well as TSIS-social skills, RSA-structured style with 5PFs-conscientiousness. Unexpectedly but interestingly, measures of RSA-family cohesion and RSA-social resources were also related to personality. Furthermore, the RSA was unrelated to cognitive abilities. This study supported the convergent and discriminative validity of the scale, and thus the inference that individuals scoring high on this scale are psychologically healthier, better adjusted, and thus more resilient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Resilience in the Face of Catastrophe: Optimism, Personality, and Coping in the Kosovo Crisis
Riolli, L., Savicki, V., & Cepani, A. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x · Cited by 2,166
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 1×
“Despite criticism (Block, 1995), it has received considerable empirical support across cultures (McCrae and Costa, 1997).”
BackgroundEgeland, B., Carlson, E., & Sroufe, L. A. (1993) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400006131 · Cited by 979
Raykov, T. (2001) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711001159582 · Cited by 415 · cited 4×
“Knowing that the 37-item version crossvalidated well, the next step implied post hoc modelling within each resilience factor (now including all the 40 items), to remove poorly fitting items.”
MethodInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Asendorpf, 2001, Eur J Pers, 15, 169, 10.1002/per.408 · DOI · Paper page
- Cederblad, 1995, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 245, 11, 10.1007/BF02191539 · DOI
- American Lives: Looking Back at the Children of the Great Depression. New York: Free Press, 1993.
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1988.
- Costa, 1995, J Pers Ass, 64, 21, 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Cowen, 1988, Am J Community Psychol, 16, 591, 10.1007/BF00922773 · DOI · Paper page
- Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: HarperCollins, 1990.
- Davey, 2003, J Adolesc Res, 18, 347, 10.1177/0743558403018004002 · DOI
- DiStefano, 2002, Struct Equation Model, 9, 327, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0903_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Egeland, 1983, Child Abuse Negl, 7, 459, 10.1016/0145-2134(83)90053-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Engvik, 1993, J Norw Psychol Ass, 30, 884
- , . Handbook of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Jaren: Vigga trykk, 1978.
- Friborg, 2003, Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 12, 65, 10.1002/mpr.143 · DOI · Paper page
- Furnham, 1997, Pers Individual Diff, 22, 669, 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00261-9 · DOI
- Children under stress: perspectives on antecedents and correlates of vulnerability and resistance to pathology. In , , (eds) Further Explorations in Personality. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1981, pp. 196–269.
- Hjemdal, 2001, J Norw Psychol Ass, 38, 310
- . Evaluating model fit. In (ed.) Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousands Oaks CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 76–99.
- . LISREL 8: Users' Reference Guide. Mooresville IN: Scientific Software Inc, 1996.
- Luthar, 1991, Child Dev, 62, 600, 10.2307/1131134 · DOI
- , . Maternal drug abuse versus other psychological disturbances: Risks and resilience among children. In (ed.) Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 104–29. · DOI
- Martinussen, 1997, Int J Aviat Psychol, 8, 33, 10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_2 · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_2
- McCrae, 1990, Stress Med, 6, 237, 10.1002/smi.2460060309 · DOI · Paper page
- McCrae, 1997, Am Psychol, 52, 509, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 · DOI · Paper page
- . Vulnerability, coping and growth. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1976.
- Nezlek, 2001, J Soc Clin Psychol, 20, 452, 10.1521/jscp.20.4.452.22398 · DOI
- . Hard growing: children who survive. In , , , (eds) Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 97–119. · DOI
- Rammstedt, 2004, Eur J Pers, 18, 1, 10.1002/per.495 · DOI
- Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Psychologist Press, 1986.
- Riggio, 1986, J Pers Soc Psychol, 51, 649, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.649 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.649 · Paper page
- Ross, 1972, Am J Ment Defic, 76, 545
- Rutter, 1985, Br J Psychiatry, 147, 598, 10.1192/bjp.147.6.598 · DOI · Paper page
- Silvera, 2001, Scand J Psychol, 42, 313, 10.1111/1467-9450.00242 · DOI · Paper page
- Applying the triarchic theory of human intelligence in the classroom. In (eds) Intelligence, Instruction, and Assessment: Theory into Practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1998, pp. 1–15. · DOI
- Sullivan, 1938, Psychiatry: J Stud Interpers Process, 1, 121, 10.1080/00332747.1938.11022177 · DOI
- Vaillant, 2000, Am J Orthopsychiatry, 70, 215, 10.1037/h0087783 · DOI
- Werner, 1993, Dev Psychopathol, 5, 503, 10.1017/S095457940000612X · DOI · Paper page
- Journeys from childhood to midlife: risk, resilience, and recovery. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
- . Overcoming the Odds. High Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1992. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 · Cited by 2,079
“5a The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) (Norway/Norwegian Friborg et al. (2003) Adults (mean age women = 33.7, men = 36.2) Self report 5 (37) To examine intrapersonal and interpersonal protective factors presumed to facilitate adaptation to psychosocial adversities (personal competence, social competence, family cohe…”
BackgroundInfluentialDavydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003 · Cited by 1,189
A Review of Instruments Measuring Resilience
Ahern, N. R., Kiehl, E. M., Lou Sole, M., & Byers, J. (2006) · Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1080/01460860600677643 · Cited by 649
What is resilience? An integrative review of the empirical literature.
Aburn, G., Gott, M., & Hoare, K. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12888 · Cited by 639
Hjemdal, O., Vogel, P. A., Solem, S., Hagen, K., & Stiles, T. C. (2011) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.719 · Cited by 431
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-42
- ISSN
- 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0657
- OpenAlex
- W2139484462
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3864 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.