Cited by 4,234Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Personality trait structure as a human universal.

McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T.·1997·American Psychologist

Abstract

Patterns of covariation among personality traits in English-speaking populations can be summarized by the five-factor model (FFM). To assess the cross-cultural generalizability of the FFM, data from studies using 6 translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (P.T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1992) were compared with the American factor structure. German, Portuguese, Hebrew, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese samples (N = 7,134) showed similar structures after varimax rotation of 5 factors. When targeted rotations were used, the American factor structure was closely reproduced, even at the level of secondary loadings. Because the samples studied represented highly diverse cultures with languages from 5 distinct language families, these data strongly suggest that personality trait structure is universal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is an emerging consensus that there are largely universal dimensions along which individuals differ, but that there are also culturally specific antecedents to personality-based reactions, and that there is culturally specific content to the behavioral expression of universal traits.

    “There is an emerging consensus that there are largely universal dimensions along which individuals differ, but that there are also culturally spe- cific antecedents to personality-based reactions, and that there is culturally specific content to the behavioral expression of universal traits.”
  • Translations of English-language measures based on the five-factor model of personality, such as the NEO Personality Inventory, have consistently found the same five-factor structure in different cultures.

    “Translations of English-language measures based on the five- factor model of personality, such as the NEO Personality In- ventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992), have consistently found the same five-factor structure in different cultures”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
Affiliations
National Institute on Aging (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1997-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
509-516
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2033642053
Cited by
4,234
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 190 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 189 · 2023: 245 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 325 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 183 · 2017: 190 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 168 · 2013: 176 · 2012: 189
FWCI
59.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality traits, cross-cultural universality, NEO-PI-R, factor structure, secondary loading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Culture, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review