Cited by 53Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

ADHD in a representative sample of the Brazilian population: estimated prevalence and comparative adequacy of criteria between adolescents and adults according to the item response theory

Open access
Polanczyk, Guilherme, Laranjeira, Ronaldo, Zaleski, Marcos, Pinsky, Ilana, Caetano, Raul, Rohde, Luis Augusto·2010·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a clinically significant disorder in adulthood, but current diagnostic criteria and instruments do not seem to adequately capture the complexity of the disorder in this developmental phase. Accordingly, there are limited data on the proportion of adults affected by the disorder, specially in developing countries. Method We assessed a representative household sample of the Brazilian population for ADHD with the Adult ADHD Self-report Scale (ASRS) Screener, and evaluated the instrument according to the Rasch model of item response theory. Results The sample was comprised by 3007 individuals, and the overal prevalence of positive screeners for ADHD was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-7.0]. Rasch analyses revealed the misfitt of the overall sample to expectations of the model. The evaluation of the sample stratified by age revealed that data for adolescents showed a signficant fittnes to the model expectations, while items completed by adults were not adequated. Conclusions The lack of fitness to the model for adult respondents challenges the possibility of a linear transformation of the ordinal data into interval measures and the utilization of parametric analyses of data. This result suggests that diagnostic criteria and instruments for adult ADHD must take into account a developmental perspective. Moreover, it calls for further evaluation of currently employed research methods in light of modern theories of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.319

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polanczyk, G., Laranjeira, R., Zaleski, M., Pinsky, I., Caetano, R., & Rohde, L. A.
Affiliations
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-19
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
177-184
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2170777785
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Governo Brasil
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
adult ADHD, ADHD prevalence, Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, item response theory, Rasch model, adolescents versus adults, psychometric validation, Brazilian population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brazil, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review