The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of the static dephasing regime theory to superparamagnetic iron‐oxide loaded cells
Open accessAbstract
The relaxation rates of iron‐oxide nanoparticles compartmentalized within cells were studied and found to satisfy predictions of the static dephasing (SD) regime theory. THP‐1 cells in cell culture were loaded using two different iron‐oxide nanoparticles (superparamagnetic iron‐oxide (SPIO) and ultrasmall SPIO (USPIO)) with four different iron concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/ml) and for five different incubation times (6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hr). Cellular iron‐oxide uptake was assessed using a newly developed imaging version of MR susceptometry, and was found to be linear with both dose and incubation time. R sensitivity to iron‐oxide loaded cells was found to be 70 times greater than for R2, and 3100 times greater than for R1. This differs greatly from uniformly distributed nanoparticles and is consistent with a cellular bulk magnetic susceptibility (BMS) relaxation mechanism. The cellular magnetic moment was large enough that R2′ relaxivity agreed closely with SD regime theory predictions for all cell samples tested where the local magnetic dose (LMD) is the sample magnetization due to the presence of iron‐oxide particles). Uniform suspensions of SPIO and USPIO produced R2′ relaxivities that were a factor of 3 and 8 less, respectively, than SD regime theory predictions. These results are consistent with theoretical estimates of the required mass of iron per compartment needed to guarantee SD‐regime‐dominant relaxivity. For cellular samples, R2 was shown to be dependent on both the concentration and distribution of iron‐oxide particles, while R2′ was sensitive to iron‐oxide concentration alone. This work is an important first step in quantifying cellular iron content and ultimately mapping the density of a targeted cell population. Magn Reson Med 48:52–61, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Macrophages in Multiple Sclerosis
Brück, W., Sommermeier, N., Bergmann, M., Zettl, U., Goebel, H. H., Kretzschmar, H. A., & Lassmann, H. (1996) · Immunobiology · doi:10.1016/s0171-2985(96)80024-6 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Lee, N., & Hyeon, T. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15248c · Cited by 995
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker
Wang, Y., & Liu, T. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 · Cited by 878
Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900232t · Cited by 632
Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping
Deistung, A., Schweser, F., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2017) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3569 · Cited by 338
Talelli, M., Rijcken, C. J. F., Lammers, T., Seevinck, P. R., Storm, G., van Nostrum, C. F., & Hennink, W. E. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la8036499 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowen, C. V., Zhang, X., Saab, G., Gareau, P. J., & Rutt, B. K.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-61
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2165483316
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of the static dephasing regime theory to superparamagnetic iron‐oxide loaded cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.10192
- The paper
- Bowen, C. V., Zhang, X., Saab, G., Gareau, P. J., & Rutt, B. K. (2002). Application of the static dephasing regime theory to superparamagnetic iron‐oxide loaded cells. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.