Cited by 890Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images

Open access
Vaughan, J.T., Garwood, M., Collins, C.M., Liu, W., DelaBarre, L., Adriany, G., Andersen, P., Merkle, H. +3 more·2001·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), RF field (B1), and RF power requirement for human head imaging were examined at 7T and 4T magnetic field strengths. The variation in B1 magnitude was nearly twofold higher at 7T than at 4T (∼42% compared to ∼23%). The power required for a 90° pulse in the center of the head at 7T was approximately twice that at 4T. The SNR averaged over the brain was at least 1.6 times higher at 7T compared to 4T. These experimental results were consistent with calculations performed using a human head model and Maxwell's equations. Magn Reson Med 46:24–30, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1156

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with lower field strengths, 7T raises image SNR and functional contrast-to-noise.

    “7T provides increases in both the image SNR (Vaughan et al., 2001) and functional contrast–to-noise (Yacoub et al., 2001), compared to lower fields.”

    From The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Vaughan et al., 2001

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ugurbil K, Garwood M, Ellermann J, Hendrich K, Hinke R, Hu X, Kim S-G, Menon R, Merkle H, Ogawa S. Imaging at high magnetic fields: initial experiences at 4T. Magn Reson Q 1993;9:259 -277.
  2. Pan JW, Vaughan JT, Kuzniecky RI, Pohost GM, Hetherington HP. High resolution neuroimaging at 4.1T. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:915- 921.
  3. Lee S-P, Silva AC, Ugurbil K, Kim S-G. Diffusion weighted spin echo fMRI at 9.4 T: microvascular/tissue contribution to BOLD signal changes. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:919 -928.
  4. Robitaille PM, Abduljalil AM, Kangarlu A, Zhang X, Yu Y, Burgess R, Bair S, Noa P, Yang L, Zhu H, Palmer B, Jiang Z, Chakeres DM, Spigos D. Human magnetic resonance imaging at 8 T. NMR Biomed 1998;11: 263-265.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughan, J. T., Garwood, M., Collins, C. M., Liu, W., DelaBarre, L., Adriany, G., Andersen, P., Merkle, H., Goebel, R., Smith, M. B., & Ugurbil, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vaughan, J.T.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
24-30
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2120836547
Cited by
890
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 41
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca064338-04, RR08079)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA076535, CA-64338, CA 76535)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 08079, P41RR008079)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
7T MRI, RF power, B1 field homogeneity, signal-to-noise ratio, human head imaging, human head model, Maxwell's equations, ultra-high field MRI
MeSH terms
Brain, Calibration, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radio Waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review