The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating radiofrequency power deposition in body NMR imaging
Abstract
Simple theoretical estimates of the average, maximum, and spatial variation of the radiofrequency power deposition (specific absorption rate) during hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance imaging are deduced for homogeneous spheres and for cylinders of biological tissue with a uniformly penetrating linear rf field directed axially and transverse to the cylindrical axis. These are all simple scalar multiples of the expression for the cylinder in an axial field published earlier (Med. Phys. 8, 510 (1981). Exact solutions for the power deposition in the cylinder with axial (Phys. Med. Biol. 23, 630 (1978) and transversely directed rf field are also presented, and the spatial variation of power deposition in head and body models is examined. In the exact models, the specific absorption rates decrease rapidly and monotonically with decreasing radius despite local increases in rf field amplitude. Conversion factors are provided for calculating the power deposited by Gaussian and sinc‐modulated rf pulses used for slice selection in NMR imaging, relative to rectangular profiled pulses. Theoretical estimates are compared with direct measurements of the total power deposited in the bodies of nine adult males by a 63‐MHz body‐imaging system with transversely directed field, taking account of cable and NMR coil losses. The results for the average power deposition agree within about 20% for the exact model of the cylinder with axial field, when applied to the exposed torso volume enclosed by the rf coil. The average values predicted by the simple spherical and cylindrical models with axial fields, the exact cylindrical model with transverse field, and the simple truncated cylinder model with transverse field were about two to three times that measured, while the simple model consisting of an infinitely long cylinder with transverse field gave results about six times that measured. The surface power deposition measured by observing the incremental power as a function of external torso radius was comparable to the average value. This is consistent with the presence of a variable thickness peripheral adipose layer which does not substantially increase surface power deposition with increasing torso radius. The absence of highly localized intensity artifacts in 63‐MHz body images does not suggest anomalously intense power deposition at localized internal sites, although peak power is difficult to measure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil
Collins, C. M., Li, S., & Smith, M. B. (1998) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400610 · Cited by 272
Thermoregulatory responses to RF energy absorption
Adair, E. R., & Black, D. R. (2003) · Bioelectromagnetics · doi:10.1002/bem.10133 · Cited by 117
Magnetic resonance imaging: Calculation of rates of energy absorption by a human‐torso model
Grandolfo, M., Vecchia, P., & Gandhi, O. P. (1990) · Bioelectromagnetics · doi:10.1002/bem.2250110203 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Bottomley, P. A., Redington, R. W., Edelstein, W. A., & Schenck, J. F.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 336-349
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2084333166
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating radiofrequency power deposition in body NMR imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910020404
- The paper
- Bottomley, P. A., Redington, R. W., Edelstein, W. A., & Schenck, J. F. (1985). Estimating radiofrequency power deposition in body NMR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910020404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.