The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The NMR phased array
Abstract
We describe methods for simultaneously acquiring and subsequently combining data from a multitude of closely positioned NMR receiving coils. The approach is conceptually similar to phased array radar and ultrasound and hence we call our techniques the “NMR phased array.” The NMR phased array offers the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and resolution of a small surface coil over fields‐of‐view (FOV) normally associated with body imaging with no increase in imaging time. The NMR phased array can be applied to both imaging and spectroscopy for all pulse sequences. The problematic interactions among nearby surface coils is eliminated (a) by overlapping adjacent coils to give zero mutual inductance, hence zero interaction, and (b) by attaching low input impedance preamplifiers to all coils, thus eliminating interference among next nearest and more distant neighbors. We derive an algorithm for combining the data from the phased array elements to yield an image with optimum SNR. Other techniques which are easier to implement at the cost of lower SNR are explored. Phased array imaging is demonstrated with high resolution (512 × 512, 48‐cm FOV, and 32‐cm FOV) spin‐echo images of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Data were acquired from four‐element linear spine arrays, the first made of 12‐cm square coils and the second made of 8‐cm square coils. When compared with images from a single 15 × 30‐cm rectangular coil and identical imaging parameters, the phased array yields a 2X and 3X higher SNR at the depth of the spine ( ∼ 7 cm). © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field
Marques, J. P., Kober, T., Krueger, G., van der Zwaag, W., Van de Moortele, P.-F., & Gruetter, R. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 · Cited by 1,453
Dietrich, O., Raya, J. G., Reeder, S. B., Reiser, M. F., & Schoenberg, S. O. (2007) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.20969 · Cited by 992
Uğurbil, K., Xu, J., Auerbach, E. J., Moeller, S., Vu, A. T., Duarte-Carvajalino, J. M., Lenglet, C., Wu, X., Schmitter, S., Van de Moortele, P. F., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.012 · Cited by 812
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker
Wang, Y., & Liu, T. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 · Cited by 878
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
Ladd, M. E., Bachert, P., Meyerspeer, M., Moser, E., Nagel, A. M., Norris, D. G., Schmitter, S., Speck, O., Straub, S., & Zaiss, M. (2018) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Roemer, P. B., Edelstein, W. A., Hayes, C. E., Souza, S. P., & Mueller, O. M.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-225
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2013816305
- Cited by
- 2,322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NMR phased array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910160203
- The paper
- Roemer, P. B., Edelstein, W. A., Hayes, C. E., Souza, S. P., & Mueller, O. M. (1990). The NMR phased array. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910160203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.