The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nuclear relaxation of human brain gray and white matter: Analysis of field dependence and implications for MRI
Abstract
The dependence of 1 / T1 on the magnetic field strength (the relaxation dispersion) has been measured at 37°C on autopsy samples of human brain gray and white matter at field strengths corresponding to proton Larmor frequencies between 10 kHz and 50 MHz (0.0002‐1.2 T). Additional measurements of 1 / T1 and 1 / T2 have been performed at 200 MHz (4.7 T) and 20 MHz (0.47 T), respectively. Absolute signal amplitudes are found to be proportional to the sample water content, not to the “proton density,” and it is concluded that the myelin lipids do not contribute to the signal. Transverse magnetization decay data can be fitted with a triple exponential function, giving characteristic results for each tissue type, and are insensitive to variations of the pulse spacing interval. The longitudinal relaxation dispersion curves show characteristic shapes for each tissue type. The most striking difference is a large dispersion for white matter at very high fields. As a consequence, the relative difference in 1 / T1 between gray and white matter shows a marked maximum around 10 MHz. Possible implications for MRI are discussed. A weighted least‐squares fit of the dispersions has been performed using a four‐parameter function of the form The quality of the fit is superior to that of other functions proposed previously. The results of these fits are used to predict image contrast between gray and white matter at different field strengths. © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance
Mackay, A., Whittall, K., Adler, J., Li, D., Paty, D., & Graeb, D. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910310614 · Cited by 914
Insights into brain microstructure from the T2 distribution
MacKay, A., Laule, C., Vavasour, I., Bjarnason, T., Kolind, S., & Mädler, B. (2006) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.037 · Cited by 347
Magnetic Resonance of Myelin Water: An in vivo Marker for Myelin
MacKay, A. L., & Laule, C. (2016) · Brain Plasticity · doi:10.3233/bpl-160033 · Cited by 284
TE dependent Diffusion Imaging (TEdDI) distinguishes between compartmental T2 relaxation times
Veraart, J., Novikov, D. S., & Fieremans, E. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.030 · Cited by 212
Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and SQUID detected nuclear MR in microtesla magnetic fields
Volegov, P., Matlachov, A. N., Espy, M. A., George, J. S., & Kraus, R. H. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20193 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, H. W., Rinck, P. A., van Haverbeke, Y., & Muller, R. N.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-334
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2045254000
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear relaxation of human brain gray and white matter: Analysis of field dependence and implications for MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910160212
- The paper
- Fischer, H. W., Rinck, P. A., van Haverbeke, Y., & Muller, R. N. (1990). Nuclear relaxation of human brain gray and white matter: Analysis of field dependence and implications for MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910160212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.