Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms

Weaver, J. B., Xu, Yansun, Healy, D. M., Cromwell, L. D.·1991·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

A new method of filtering MR images is presented that uses wavelet transforms instead of Fourier transforms. The new filtering method does not reduce the sharpness of edges. However, the new method does eliminate any small structures that are similar in size to the noise eliminated. There are many possible extensions of the filter. © 1991 Academic Press, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1910210213

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Weaver, J. B., Xu, Y., Healy, D. M., & Cromwell, L. D.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-10
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
288-295
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2032871739
Cited by
276
References
2
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910210213
The paper
Weaver, J. B., Xu, Y., Healy, D. M., & Cromwell, L. D. (1991). Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910210213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.