Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with ανβ3‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles

Open access
Schmieder, Anne H., Winter, Patrick M., Caruthers, Shelton D., Harris, Thomas D., Williams, Todd A., Allen, John S., Lacy, Elizabeth K., Zhang, Huiying, Scott, Michael J., Hu, Grace, Robertson, J. David, Wickline, Samuel A., Lanza, Gregory M.·2005·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Neovascularization is a critical component in the progression of malignant melanoma. The objective of this study was to determine whether α ν β 3‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles can detect and characterize sparse α ν β integrin expression on neovasculature induced by nascent melanoma xenografts (∼30 mm 3) at 1.5T. Athymic nude mice bearing human melanoma tumors were intravenously injected with α v β 3‐integrin‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles, nontargeted paramagnetic nanoparticles, or α v β 3‐targeted‐nonparamagnetic nanoparticles 2 hr before they were injected with α v β 3‐integrin‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles (i.e., in vivo competitive blockade) and imaged with MRI. Contrast enhancement of neovascularity in animals that received α ν β 3‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles increased 173% by 120 min. Signal contrast with nontargeted paramagnetic nanoparticles was approximately 50% less than that in the targeted group (P < 0.05). Molecular MRI results were corroborated by histology. In a competitive cell adhesion assay, incubation of α ν β 3‐expressing cells with targeted nanoparticles significantly inhibited binding to a vitronectin‐coated surface, confirming the bioactivity of the targeted nanoparticles. The present study lowers the limit previously reported for detecting sparse biomarkers with molecular MRI in vivo. This technique may be employed to noninvasively detect very small regions of angiogenesis associated with nascent melanoma tumors, and to phenotype and stage early melanoma in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med 53:621–627, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.20391

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Schmieder, A. H., Winter, P. M., Caruthers, S. D., Harris, T. D., Williams, T. A., Allen, J. S., Lacy, E. K., Zhang, H., Scott, M. J., Hu, G., Robertson, J. D., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-18
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
621-627
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2009048752
Cited by
246
References
2
FWCI
22.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with ανβ3‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20391
The paper
Schmieder, A. H., Winter, P. M., Caruthers, S. D., Harris, T. D., Williams, T. A., Allen, J. S., Lacy, E. K., Zhang, H., Scott, M. J., Hu, G., Robertson, J. D., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M. (2005). Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with ανβ3‐targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20391

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.