Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 706

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL): Application with fast spin‐echo imaging

Reeder, Scott B., Pineda, Angel R., Wen, Zhifei, Shimakawa, Ann, Yu, Huanzhou, Brittain, Jean H., Gold, Garry E., Beaulieu, Christopher H., Pelc, Norbert J.·2005·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Chemical shift based methods are often used to achieve uniform water–fat separation that is insensitive to Bo inhomogeneities. Many spin‐echo (SE) or fast SE (FSE) approaches acquire three echoes shifted symmetrically about the SE, creating time‐dependent phase shifts caused by water–fat chemical shift. This work demonstrates that symmetrically acquired echoes cause artifacts that degrade image quality. According to theory, the noise performance of any water–fat separation method is dependent on the proportion of water and fat within a voxel, and the position of echoes relative to the SE. To address this problem, we propose a method termed “iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetric and least‐squares estimation” (IDEAL). This technique combines asymmetrically acquired echoes with an iterative least‐squares decomposition algorithm to maximize noise performance. Theoretical calculations predict that the optimal echo combination occurs when the relative phase of the echoes is separated by 2π/3, with the middle echo centered at π/2+π k (k = any integer), i.e., (–π/6+π k, π/2+π k, 7π/6+π k). Only with these echo combinations can noise performance reach the maximum possible and be independent of the proportion of water and fat. Close agreement between theoretical and experimental results obtained from an oil–water phantom was observed, demonstrating that the iterative least‐squares decomposition method is an efficient estimator. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.20624

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 706

Metadata

Authors
Reeder, S. B., Pineda, A. R., Wen, Z., Shimakawa, A., Yu, H., Brittain, J. H., Gold, G. E., Beaulieu, C. H., & Pelc, N. J.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-09
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
636-644
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2137281603
Cited by
706
References
0
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL): Application with fast spin‐echo imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20624
The paper
Reeder, S. B., Pineda, A. R., Wen, Z., Shimakawa, A., Yu, H., Brittain, J. H., Gold, G. E., Beaulieu, C. H., & Pelc, N. J. (2005). Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL): Application with fast spin‐echo imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20624

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.