The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of tissue water as a concentration reference for proton spectroscopic imaging
Abstract
A strategy for using tissue water as a concentration standard in 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging studies on the brain is presented, and the potential errors that may arise when the method is used are examined. The sensitivity of the method to errors in estimates of the different water compartment relaxation times is shown to be small at short echo times (TEs). Using data from healthy human subjects, it is shown that different image segmentation approaches that are commonly used to account for partial volume effects (SPM2, FSL's FAST, and K‐means) lead to different estimates of metabolite levels, particularly in gray matter (GM), owing primarily to variability in the estimates of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fraction. While consistency does not necessarily validate a method, a multispectral segmentation approach using FAST yielded the lowest intersubject variability in the estimates of GM metabolites. The mean GM and white matter (WM) levels of N‐acetyl groups (NAc, primarily N‐acetylaspartate), choline (Ch), and creatine (Cr) obtained in these subjects using the described method with FAST multispectral segmentation are reported: GM [NAc] = 17.16 ± 1.19 mM; WM [NAc] = 14.26 ± 1.38 mM; GM [Ch] = 3.27 ± 0.47 mM; WM [Ch] = 2.65 ± 0.25 mM; GM [Cr] = 13.98 ± 1.20 mM; and WM [Cr] = 7.10 ± 0.67 mM. Magn Reson Med, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations
Wilson, M., Andronesi, O., Barker, P. B., Bartha, R., Bizzi, A., Bolan, P. J., Brindle, K. M., Choi, I., Cudalbu, C., Dydak, U., et al. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27742 · Cited by 470
Self-citationHarris, A. D., Puts, N. A. J., & Edden, R. A. E. (2015) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.24903 · Cited by 306
Reduced striatal GABA in unmedicated children with ADHD at 7T
Puts, N. A., Ryan, M., Oeltzschner, G., Horska, A., Edden, R. A. E., & Mahone, E. M. (2020) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111082 · Cited by 65
Webb, E. A., Elliott, L., Carlin, D., Wilson, M., Hall, K., Netherton, J., Reed, J., Barrett, T. G., Salwani, V., Clayden, J. D., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01481 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Gasparovic, C., Song, T., Devier, D., Bockholt, H. J., Caprihan, A., Mullins, P. G., Posse, S., Jung, R. E., & Morrison, L. A.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1219-1226
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1994958750
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of tissue water as a concentration reference for proton spectroscopic imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20901
- The paper
- Gasparovic, C., Song, T., Devier, D., Bockholt, H. J., Caprihan, A., Mullins, P. G., Posse, S., Jung, R. E., & Morrison, L. A. (2006). Use of tissue water as a concentration reference for proton spectroscopic imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.